人文及社會科學集刊
logo-人文及社會科學集刊

人文及社會科學集刊
logo_m-人文及社會科學集刊

    跳至中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • 期刊簡介
    • 期刊簡介
    • 訂閱辦法
    • 與我們聯絡
  • 編輯委員會
  • 卷期目次
    • 即將刊登論文
  • 資料庫收錄
  • 投稿須知
    • 撰稿用例
  • 線上投稿
  • 人社中心
EN
人社中心
search
人文及社會科學集刊
  • Home
  • 卷期目次
  • 《人文及社會科學集刊》 第 11卷第 02 期
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
1999年6月 11卷2期
社會救助問題:政策目的、貧窮的定義與測量
發刊日期/Published Date
1999年6月
中英文篇名/Title
社會救助問題:政策目的、貧窮的定義與測量
Problems in Social Assistance: Policy Goals, the Definition and Measurement of Poverty
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
呂朝賢
Chao-hsien Leu
頁碼/Pagination
233-263
摘要/Abstract

本文討論社會救助政策中的三大要素:目的預設、貧窮定義與測量三者的適宜性。在文中我們分別檢視目前社會救助政策在這三方面應再思慮的地方,並提出可能的替代方式。本文認爲目前的目的預設雖不必完全廢除,但就臺灣社會而言,應再放寬,並以社會對應做爲貧窮的定義。貧窮者可包含二類:「基本需求不滿足者」及「社會期望生活水準不滿足者」。而貧窮門檻可以訂在後者,以前者當做是貧戶間差異需求的分野。未滿足基本需求者,政府應無條件給予協助,而未滿足社會期望生活水準者,政府可以依專業工作人員的判斷來提供適當的服務。如此的設計,有助於我們把以往所謂「近貧人口」的需求考慮進社會救助人群之中。且使社會救助有更積極的功能。至於貧窮的測量則應整合社會共識法、行爲法與預算法,才得以反映本文所採之貧窮定義。

In this paper, we examine the problems involved in three important components of the public assistance policy: the goals of Social assistance policy, the definition of poverty and the measurement of poverty. It was found that there was room for improvement in each of these three areas. While it is unnecessary to totally abandon policy guidelines, certain aspects of these goals should be relaxed to meet the situation in Taiwan today. In the area of the definition of poverty, we concur with the idea of using "social coping" as the foundation. The designation to be "poor" includes two categories. One is where an individual fails to meet "basic needs," and the other is where an individual cannot reach their "living standard of social expectancy." It is our position that the "poverty threshold" should extend beyond meeting "basic needs" and should also be based on reaching the "living standard of social expectancy." We futher hold the position that the government should provide welfare services to all persons failing to meet their basic needs. However, for those who can not reach their "living standard of social expectancy." government could provide appropriate services based on professional criteria. These suggested change should improve Taiwan's public assistance policy, make it more active, and help it to be able to provide needed services to those "near poor" who are otherwise excluded from the benefits of public assistance. Finally, in the area of measuring poverty, we suggest integrating the "social consensus approaches," the "behavioral approach," and the "budget standard methods."

關鍵字/Keyword
社會救助, 政策目的, 貪窮定義, 貪窮測量
Social Assistance, Policy Goals, the definition of poverty the Measurement of poverty, living standard of Social expectancy poverty threshold
學科分類/Subject

主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
摘要 全文PDF
相關文章
  • 貧窮女性化與貧窮程度的性別差異
  • 臺灣的社會救助動態:趨勢、型態與成因
  • 1960s以降的美國貧窮理論:回顧與整合
  • 弗格森社會哲學述論
  • 老人單身家戶、女性單親家戶與貧窮:嘉義縣低收入戶的貧窮歷程

  • 期刊簡介
  • 編輯委員會
  • 卷期目次
  • 資料庫收錄
  • 投稿須知
  • 線上投稿

115臺北市南港區研究院路二段128號 中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心

Tel: 02-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.隱私權及安全政策版號:V1.1.2