Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 06, Number 02
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
1994 / June Volume 6 No.2
Reverse Reforming the Land Taxation System in Taiwan

Number of Clicks:1827; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
1994 / June
中英文篇名/Title
土地稅制須逆向改革
Reverse Reforming the Land Taxation System in Taiwan
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
陳文久
Van-jeou chen
頁碼/Pagination
135-165
摘要/Abstract

本文探討在土地供給非固定及地價具有抗跌性的情況下,應如何改革土地稅以符合租稅的效率及公平基本原則。由於筆者發現提高增值稅會增加超額稅負,但是提高地價稅反而會降低,平均地權的土地稅制違背租稅的效率與公平基本原則,故建議應提高地價稅收回公共設施成本並將增值稅負調整至與綜所稅負一致才公平。加上,比例稅可克服實價認定困難,且其產生的行政效率遠大於累進稅量能課稅的益處,故乃建議增值稅改按實際增值比例稅課徵,並將稅率降至與綜所稅平均稅負一致。基此,最後筆者建議當前土地稅改革不宜仍遵循平均地權的土地稅制主張,即地價稅要輕增值稅要重,而應改朝地價稅要重增值稅要輕的逆方向進行改革。

The concept of constant supply of land in the economic literature being shown wrong, this paper uses new concept of nonconstant supply of land instead to investiagte the efficiency and the equity of land taxes. The author finds that an increase in the land value tax will decrease the excess burden and enhance the equity, but an increase in the land value increment tax will get the opposite results. However, the Republic of China have adopted the perverse policy, i.e., put heaviest taxes on land value increments but light taxation on land value. Therefore, reverse reforming current land taxation is suggested, namely, raising land value tax enough to get back the cost of the public goods and lowering the nominal land value increments tax rate to be same as that of the property income tax.

關鍵字/Keyword

學科分類/Subject

主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • Text Mining for Social Studies: Meaning-based Document Classification and Its Problems
  • Editor’s Report: Special Issue: Political Change and Civic Consciousness
  • Comment
  • The Changes of the Conceptions of Human Rights: A Social Ecological Analysis
  • The Idea of Gongde: History and Conceptual Reconstruction

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2026. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3