Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 15, Number 03
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2003 / September Volume 15 No.3
An Estimation of the Response Bias in the Question "Whether at Work" in the Taiwan Manpower Utilization Survey

Number of Clicks:1435; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
2003 / September
中英文篇名/Title
「台灣地區人力運用調查」中「工作與否」調查偏誤之估計
An Estimation of the Response Bias in the Question "Whether at Work" in the Taiwan Manpower Utilization Survey
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
余士迪, 王瑜琳
Shihti Yu, Yu-lin Wang
頁碼/Pagination
475-500
摘要/Abstract

鑑於主計處「台灣地區人力運用調査」資料使用的普遍性與重要性,本文針對其中「工作與否」選項是否存在調査偏誤,應用 Hsiao and Sun  (1999) 的單邊反應模型與隨機反應模型,偵測偏誤來源並估計偏誤大小。實證結果發現,社會可欲是造成1998年「工作與否」資料中「不在做工作」虛報「在做工作」者的主因,偏誤大小約有5%的機率。此外,以與解釋「工作與否」大部分相同的變數來解釋社會可欲調査偏誤時,會發生認定上的問題,使估計結果不理想。因此,本文探討回答問卷的兩種方式對調査偏誤的影響。結果顯示,問卷非本人回答的社會可欲較高;忽略社會可欲調査偏誤將導致低估年齡丶敎育程度以及「結婚」對就業的影響,也可能高估高齡人口與結婚女性的就業情形。

This paper applies the one-sided response and the randomized response models of Hsiao and Sun (1999) to investigate the response bias in the question "whether at work" in the Taiwan Manpower Utilization Survey. Approximately 5% of "yes" responses to the "whether at work" question in the 1998 survey were found to be attributable to the bias of social desirability. Ignoring this bias leads to an underestimation of the influence of age, education and marital status on employment. Specifi­cally, the employment levels of the aged population and married women were overrated. The findings suggest that when surveys invite socially sensitive answers, the class of estimation models that incorporates re­sponse biases should be used.

關鍵字/Keyword
人力運用調查, 調查偏誤, 社會可欲
manpower utilization survey, survey response bias, social desirability
學科分類/Subject
經濟學
Economics
主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • Adam Ferguson's Social Philosophy: Exposition and Assessment
  • Singlehood and Solitary-living Trends Among Individuals Aged 50 and Above in Taiwan:Insights from Long-term Observations Based on 2000–2020 Population Census
  • The Paradox of Tolerance: Contemporary Art and Social Norms
  • Women's Housework, Men's Housework: Explanations for the Continuing Gender Division of Housework
  • Between Adult Children and Aging Parents: Intergenerational Relationship and Well-being in Midlife

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2026. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3