Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 19, Number 04
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2007 / December Volume 19 No.4
An Analysis of Drug Co-payment Plans under National Health Insurance

Number of Clicks:1855; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
2007 / December
中英文篇名/Title
健保體系下藥品費用分攤制度的分析
An Analysis of Drug Co-payment Plans under National Health Insurance
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
洪乙禎
Yi-chen Hong
頁碼/Pagination
473-504
摘要/Abstract

醫藥科技進步伴隨而來的是藥品支出快速增加,藥品費用成為帶動醫療支出成長的重要因素。為控制藥費成長,各國常透過健保限定藥品給付的內容,並採取各種藥價或藥費管制措施。台灣在1995年起實施的全民健保,明訂健保給付的藥品項目、並統一核價,以「藥價基準」直接管控藥價;不過,在考量健保財務與民眾用藥權益下,二代健保修法草案則增訂「藥品差額負擔」,即是類似德國首先實施的「參考價格制度」。本文在健保介入下,考慮多種性質相同或相異的藥品項目,透過市場供需行為,分析直接管制藥價和藥品差額負擔兩類制度的影響效果。分析結果顯示,健保直接管制藥價,將使整體資源配置全受訂價的左右,藥品選用可能因為不當的訂價發生扭曲;而「藥品差額負擔」是一管制與市場機能的混合模式,適當考量藥品性質的健保給付上限,可使藥品利用不致於背離最適配置太遠。

Medication expenses have become an important cause of the increas­ing medical costs in many countries. Different cost-sharing plans have been designed to reduce drug spending. Under National Health Insurance (NHI) in Taiwan, pharmaceutical policies are mainly aimed at control­ling drug prices and regulating insurance coverage. However, these policies have fallen into a difficul ttradeoff between efficiency and acces­sibility. The second generation NHI reforms presented a new drug co-payment plan which was similar to the reference pricing in Germany. This study is to show the effects of different medication policies, i.e. the direct control on prices and the new plan of reference pricng. Under the direct price-control policy, the regulation on drug prices would be the most important cause for medication utilization. Also, an inadequate regulation might lead to distortion effects on medication substitutions. However, the new co-payment plan for medication expenses would be a combination of controlling policy and market mechanism. It could mitigate the distortion on medication utilization and might provide consumers with more medication choices.

關鍵字/Keyword
藥品價格, 藥品政策, 二代健保
medication price, pharmaceutical policy, the second generation NHI
學科分類/Subject
經濟學
Economics
主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • Market Openness and Product Quality
  • Cross-country Policy-learning as Knowledge-making: Comparing Literature Printed in Chinese and English about the German Long-term Care Insurance (1995–2017)
  • Investment, Subsidy, and Audit in Environmental Protection
  • Cigarette Price Hike: The Effect of Tobacco Health Welfare Tax on Cigarette Consumption
  • Labor Market Policy in Taiwan and in Germany: Focusing on the Employment Service Policy

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3