Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 28, Number 04
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2016 / December Volume 28 No.4
The Coming of Networked Social Movements? Social Ties and Social Media in the Sunflower Movement

Number of Clicks:3502; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
2016 / December
中英文篇名/Title
網絡社會運動時代的來臨?太陽花運動參與者的人際連帶與社群媒體因素初探
The Coming of Networked Social Movements? Social Ties and Social Media in the Sunflower Movement
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
陳婉琪, 張恒豪, 黃樹仁
Wan-chi Chen, Heng-hao Chang, Su-jen Huang
頁碼/Pagination
467-501
摘要/Abstract

近年社群媒體興起,學者提出「網絡社會運動」、「連結行動的邏輯」等概念來理解集體行動新模式。2014年春天,震盪臺灣社會的太陽花運動,其行動邏輯能否驗證這些新理論?本文利用〈太陽花運動參與者調查〉資料,輔以〈台灣社會變遷調查〉,分析這場社運中影響參與者高度投入之因素,研究發現,因「現實生活人際關係」而前來的現場靜坐者較不可能成為長期駐守者,投入時數最低;弱連帶(陌生網友)所帶來的投入程度反而遠高於強連帶。此外,在給定相同年齡、就業狀態的情況下,社群媒體使用者的參與程度確實比非使用者來得高。本文研究結論具有公民社會強化的重大意涵。

The Sunflower Movement, which occurred in the spring of 2014 in Taiwan, has shaken the political kaleidoscope of Taiwan. Based on a survey of sit-in demonstrators around the Legislative Yuan during the protest, this study explores to what extent the logic of the collective (as well as perhaps connective) action reflects the current social movement discourses. Contrary to conventional wisdom, strong ties are not more effective in inducing higher levels of protest action. Among the sit-in participants, those who came on the basis of real life personal ties stayed much fewer hours than those who came spontaneously or in answer to the call of “netizens”. However, the strong ties brought more participants, whereas the weak ties (netizens) contributed to a much smaller percentage of participants. Additionally, we found that social media users spent significantly longer hours at the protest site than traditional media users.

關鍵字/Keyword
太陽花運動, 社會運動, 人際連帶, 社群媒體, 公民參與
Sunflower Movement, social movement, social media, social ties,
學科分類/Subject
社會學
Sociology
主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • Deliberation in Social Movement: A Comparison of the D-Street in the Sunflower Movement and the General Assembly in the Wild Strawberry Movement
  • Adam Ferguson's Social Philosophy: Exposition and Assessment
  • Author's Reply: Friends, Cyber Acquaintances, Facebook and the Sunflower Movement
  • Does Deliberation Foster Civic Activism? Public Deliberation, Social Capital and Political Engagement
  • China Factor or Civic Disobedience? Explaining Support for the Sunflower Movement with Panel Data

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3