Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 35, Number 03
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2023 / September Volume 35 No.3
Algorithmic Trading: Modes of Rationality Enhancement and Their Limitations Among Non-Professional Investors

Number of Clicks:2939; Number of Full Text Downloads:356; Number of Abstract Downloads:19;

發刊日期/Published Date
2023 / September
中英文篇名/Title
程式交易:散戶理性行動提升的形式與限制
Algorithmic Trading: Modes of Rationality Enhancement and Their Limitations Among Non-Professional Investors
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
陳宇翔
Yu-Hsiang Chen
頁碼/Pagination
481-524
摘要/Abstract

本文從金融社會研究觀點探討臺灣程式交易散戶,指出MultiCharts模板式交易軟體推出後降低程式交易門檻,但也限制散戶程式交易模式。不同類型的散戶經由程式增強理性行動能力的形式有所不同,顯示多重樣貌的「社會科技組構集合體」。「使用他人策略」的散戶藉由購買策略提升績效,但販售策略為編碼密封黑盒子,散戶只能依有限資訊來判斷品質。「使用自寫策略」的散戶則可經由程式交易的「科學化測試」與「執行避免干擾」來提升自己的交易績效,然而,「回測不等同未來績效」、「策略失效判斷」、「編碼僵固」等因素仍使得他們常需仰賴主觀判斷。

This paper studies algorithmic trading by non-professional investors in Taiwan from the perspective of socio-technical agencements. Software like MultiCharts has lowered the barriers to algorithmic trading, but also restricts the trading strategies available to users. Different types of retail investors have consequently enhanced their ability to trade rationally in differing ways, revealing the differing modes to perform homo economicus. Some retail investors rely on trading strategies purchased from third parties; these strategies, however, are encoded and sealed black boxes. Investors who code their own strategies can improve the rationality through scientific testing and efforts to avoid emotional interference in trading, failures of strategic judgment, rigidity of coding, and the fact that "past results do not guarantee future performance" often leads to the use of intuition in trading. The findings suggest that the attributes of human actors will impact the features of agencements, even when equipped with the same market device.

關鍵字/Keyword
程式交易, 散戶, 經濟人, 社會科技組構集合體
algorithmic trading, retail investor, homo economicus, socio-technical agencement
學科分類/Subject
經濟學, 社會學
Economics, Sociology
主題分類/Theme

DOI
10.53106/1018189X202209001
檔案下載/Download
Full Text Abstract
相關文章
  • Adam Ferguson's Social Philosophy: Exposition and Assessment
  • An Investigation into Wang Jing - wei's Collaboration with Japan and its Relationship with the Guangdong Provincial Government
  • The Impact of Signing Bilateral Free Trade Agreements on the Operations of the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation
  • Limitations and Possibilities of the Praxis of Separation of Dispensing from Prescription
  • Bringing Society Back In? A Theoretical Review on the Rise of Intermediary Organizations in China

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3