Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 34, Number 03
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2022 / September Volume 34 No.3
Daniel Defoe’s Critique of the Divine Right of Kings: A Perspective on the Reception and Interpretation of John Locke’s Two Treatises in Early Eighteenth-Century English Thought

Number of Clicks:4755; Number of Abstract Downloads:47; Number of Full Text Downloads:149;

發刊日期/Published Date
2022 / September
中英文篇名/Title
丹尼爾.笛福對君權神授理論的批判:18世紀早期英格蘭思想界對洛克《政府論》接受與詮釋的一個側面
Daniel Defoe’s Critique of the Divine Right of Kings: A Perspective on the Reception and Interpretation of John Locke’s Two Treatises in Early Eighteenth-Century English Thought
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
陳建元
Chien-yuen Chen
頁碼/Pagination
465-502
摘要/Abstract

本文所要探討的主題是笛福(Daniel Defoe)對於君權神授論的批評。本文指出笛福的人性觀和社會起源觀是他批判君權神授論的主要思想淵源。君權神授論的支持者往往會援引《舊約聖經》經文來獲取正當性,而笛福則是同樣基於其人性觀對於相同經文做出不同詮釋。本文指出,兩派的爭論背後其實有更悠久的詮釋《聖經》傳統。例如菲爾默與洛克關於君權神授正當性的論辯,同樣是用以色列分裂成南北王國時,雙方君主羅波安和耶羅波安的衝突作為論述核心。本文由此指出笛福的閱讀往往是基於君主的原罪來論述,這同時呈現出他的人性觀與政治思想之間的連繫。

Daniel Defoe’s critique of monarchs’ divine right is the focus of this article. Defoe’s critique of divine right is considered to be mostly based on his understanding of human nature and social origins. While proponents of the divine right doctrine frequently quote Old Testament texts to support their claims, Defoe interprets the same verses differently from them based on his understanding of human nature. This study finds that the argument between the two groups has a considerably older tradition of biblical interpretation. The paper points out that Defoe’s reading is often based on the original sin of the monarch, which at the same time shows the connection between his view of human nature and his political thought.

關鍵字/Keyword
約翰.洛克, 丹尼爾.笛福, 君權神授, 光榮革命
John Locke, Daniel Defoe, divine right of kings, the Glorious Revolution
學科分類/Subject
政治學, 歷史學
Political Science, History
主題分類/Theme

DOI
10.53106/1018189X2022093403002
檔案下載/Download
Abstract Full Text
相關文章
  • Preface
  • The Unified Public-Private Industry in Taiwan: The Institutionalist View
  • Author's Reply: Friends, Cyber Acquaintances, Facebook and the Sunflower Movement
  • Reply
  • Declaration

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3