2001年6月

臺灣經濟體系中之「官商合一」制度的影響範疇
The Unified Public-Private Industry in Taiwan: The Institutionalist View

研究論文 Research Article

林其昂, 楊嘉林
Chi-ang Lin, Chia-lin Yang

135-168

制度經濟學家認為主流（或新古典）經濟理論刻劃的丨市場機能」祇是一個缺乏願景 (ends-in-view) 的單調一元經濟，然而真實的多元經濟世界裡卻有影響力龐大丶願景不斷之計畫體系 (planning system) 的存在，如曾任美國經濟學會 (AEA) 會長的 John K. Galbraith  (1973a, 1985) 即指出美國的「二元經濟」(dual economy) 體系包含大企業所組成的計畫體系與小廠商所組成的市場體糸。本研究沿用並擴展曾任演化經濟學會 (AFEE) 會長之John R. Munkirs  (1985) 的制度分析 (institutional analysis) 後，證實臺灣的經濟體糸中的確存在一個影響力非比尋常之計畫部門。在1998年底，與「主控計畫體」具有連結關係的股票上市公司達 205 家，接近當時全部上市公司的一半（約 48%)。而進一步就產業別來看，此一計畫部門於金融保險業的影響力最為深鉅，其次是電子業與汽車運輸業。｛本研究確認臺灣特殊之經濟計畫模式—「統合公丶私部門的產業：臺灣的桎梏」[Unified Public-Private Indus­try: Taiwan's Yoke  (UPPITY)] ， 簡稱「自命不凡」。｝

Institutionalists claim that mainstream economic theory rooted in the concept of "market mechanism" has suffered from a failure to capture some basic realities of the true economy. Conventional wisdom, for example, fails to fully analyze the impact of giant financial and industrial corporations of the real world. In this regard, Galbraith (1973a, 1985) has shown that the economic system of the United States is typified by the planning system and the market system. Munkirs (1985) has also provided an analysis of the American economy and argued that the American economy has "centralized private sector planning." This study extends Munkirs' analytical approach to analyze the economy of Taiwan. Specifically, this study  contends that people in Taiwan live in a particular mode of centralized planning, a mode that could be boldly termed as Unified Public-Private Industry: Taiwan's Yoke (UPPITY).

臺灣經濟, 計畫部門, 「官商合一」制度［「自命不凡」(UPPITY)]
Taiwan economy, planning sector, "UPPITY"

經濟學
Economics

摘要 全文PDF