Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 33, Number 04
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2021 / December Volume 33 No.4
A Revisit to Tax Policy and Stability in a Model with Sector-Specific Externalities

Number of Clicks:1093; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of Full Text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
2021 / December
中英文篇名/Title
部門特定外部性下的稅收政策與安定性之再探討
A Revisit to Tax Policy and Stability in a Model with Sector-Specific Externalities
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
王韋能
Wei-Neng Wang
頁碼/Pagination
619-643
摘要/Abstract

本文重新審視 Guo and Harrison(2001, Review of Economic Dynamics)所提出的所得稅率安定政策。本文的研究發現,當特定產業存在部門外部性,若政府將稅收用於購買商品來做為公共服務使用,而不是移轉性支付給家計單位的話,累進與累退的所得稅政策都能使經濟體系更為穩定;且累進稅比累退稅的所得稅政策更具有安定效果。同時,本文也發現政府購買投資財比購買消費財具有更佳的安定效果。這些結果與 Guo and Harrison(2001)的主張截然不同,因此,本文的結果補充了Guo and Harrison(2001)的分析,並且為文獻提供了新的政策意涵。   

This study re-visits the stabilization of income tax policies proposed by Guo and Harrison (2001, Review of Economic Dynamics). I show that given an empirically relevant extent of sector-specific externality, both progressive and regressive tax schedules can stabilize the economy against sunspot fluctuations, if the government’s tax revenues are used to purchase goods as public services, rather than to return them to households as lump-sum transfers. A progressive tax schedule is more robust than a regressive tax schedule in terms of suppressing the belief-driven fluctuations. I also find that income taxes are more likely to suppress the sunspot fluctuations, if the government uses its revenues to purchase an investment good, instead of a consumption good. These results sharply differ from Guo and Harrison’s (2001) propositions. Thus, our study complements Guo and Harrison’s (2001) analysis and provides new policy implications to the literature.

關鍵字/Keyword
稅收政策, 總體(不)安定, 政府支出, 部門特定外部性
tax policy, aggregate (in)stability, government spending, sector-specific externality
學科分類/Subject
經濟學
Economics
主題分類/Theme

DOI
10.53106/1018189X2021123304002
檔案下載/Download
Abstract Full Text
相關文章
  • Cyclical Government Spending and Stabilization under a Balanced Budget Rule
  • Divided and Unified Government in Taiwan's Local Politics: The Cases of Hsin-chu County / City and Chia-yi County / City
  • The Unified Public-Private Industry in Taiwan: The Institutionalist View
  • An Analysis of Party Interaction from Roll-call Votes in Taiwan's Legislative Yuan: The Third Term to the Fifth Term of the Legislative Yuan
  • Virtues and Vices of Semi-presidential Government

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2026. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3