Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 15, Number 02
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2003 / June Volume 15 No.2
Autonomy and Democracy

Number of Clicks:2620; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
2003 / June
中英文篇名/Title
自由與民主
Autonomy and Democracy
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
陳瑤華
Jay-hwa Chen
頁碼/Pagination
339-363
摘要/Abstract

本文探討自主概念的歷史緣起,而且關聯於民主的意涵,來探討其系統的意義和價值。自主始於爭取強權下的獨立性,並且認同自身自由人的身份和價值,不容他人以次等公民的方式來對待,避免權益被強權所壟斷。由於衝突點在於自我認同的分歧與價值的不可通約共量,衝突不一定有和解的可能性。但眞正的困難並不在於衝突無法協調和一致,而在於如何防止強權介入溝通的程序,阻礙自我認同與價值融貫的認知。在保存自主價值方面,民主最重要的意義即在於程序具備認知的功能,而且透過合理的程序,能夠達成整體共善之目標。

This paper is about the historical origination of "autonomy" and its systematical meaning related to the idea of democracy. The concept of autonomy is raised for the independency of the communities in which people identify themselves as free and equal citizens, but under the threat of other powerful states. Afraid of being treated as inferior and second-class citizens, they have to defend their rights and interests. The conflict between communities is related to their identity and belief, who they are and what they ought to do, sometimes, it may not possible for them to reconcile with each other. But the problem is not how to reconcile their incommensurable positions, but how to defense their autonomy, not being overridden by other unjustified power. For the need of keeping the value of autonomy, the procedure of democracy has a cognitive function through which the citizens can figure out what they should and should not act.

關鍵字/Keyword
自主, 民主, 自主原則, 衝突, 融貫, 審議性
autonomy, democracy, conflict, coherence, deliberation,
學科分類/Subject
政治學
Political Science
主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • Toleration in a Liberal Democratic Society
  • Popular Sovereignty and Dernocracy: An Interpretation of Carl Schrnitt's Theory of Dernocracy
  • ‘Create Citizens, and You Have Everything You Need’? On Rousseau's Freedom, Patriotism and the Paradox of Actualizing Republic
  • The Women Who Guarded the Ancestral Fire: Sovereign Practices of Indigenous Women after Typhoon Morakot
  • Populism and Development of Democratic Politics: The Case of India

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3