Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 19, Number 04
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2007 / December Volume 19 No.4
Poll Accuracy Measures in a Quasi-Two-Way Election: An Emprirical Assessment of Taiwan's 2000 Presidential Election

Number of Clicks:1191; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
2007 / December
中英文篇名/Title
準-兩位主要候選人選情下之民調準確度評量:2000年台灣總統選舉之實證
Poll Accuracy Measures in a Quasi-Two-Way Election: An Emprirical Assessment of Taiwan's 2000 Presidential Election
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
蘇建卅, Mandy Sha
Chien-chou Su, Mandy Sha
頁碼/Pagination
505-527
摘要/Abstract

本研究主要是透過評量2000年台灣總統選舉民調準確度,探討如何在不同的選情採用不同的評量方法。從2000年台灣總統選舉結果顯示,該選舉的選情是介於兩位主要候選人與三位主要候選人的「準-兩位主要候選人」,然而是否不同的選情應該採用不同的民調準確度評量計算方法?本研究修改Mitofsky and  Traugott's用以評量1996、2000與2004美國總統選舉(兩位主要候選人)民調表現的方法,提出一套比較合理適用於評量2000年台灣總統選舉民調的方法。本研究除了採用修正的方法分析選舉民調表現外,也進一步透過實證探討影響民調準確度差異的因子。

There is little systematic study on the question of how poll accuracy should be measured. Should different measures be adopted in different election situations? Expanding upon Mitofsky and Traugott's assessment of the 1996, 2000 and 2004 U.S. pre-election polls, this paper assesses dem­ocratic Taiwan's polls in its second direct presidential election in 2000. In this paper, we first discuss the feasibility of accuracy measures in differ­ent election situation, and then focus on designing a suitable poll accu­racy measurement for Taiwan's 2000, a quasi-two-way election. Next, we adopt the proposed accuracy measurement as a response to evaluate the Taiwanese poll performance. Finally, we analyze the multitude of fac­tors that influence polling accuracy by using the proposed and modified measures to compare the effects of eight factors.

關鍵字/Keyword
民調準確度評量, 民調表現, 準-兩位主要候選人選情
poll accuracy measure, poll performance, quasi-two-way election
學科分類/Subject
政治學
Political Science
主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • Constitutional Choices and the Performance of Presidential Regimes
  • The Ifugao Indigenous People’s Education Center: Pioneering Community-led Heritage Conservation
  • The Challenges and Destiny of Liberalism: On Friedrich Naumann’s Reconstruction of the German Liberal Tradition
  • Populism and Development of Democratic Politics: The Case of India
  • Popular Sovereignty and Dernocracy: An Interpretation of Carl Schrnitt's Theory of Dernocracy

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3