Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 23, Number 01
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2011 / March Volume 23 No.1
On Environmental Quality: "Normal" versus "Luxury" Good

Number of Clicks:1236; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
2011 / March
中英文篇名/Title
環境品質對消費者而言是奢侈財?亦或正常財?
On Environmental Quality: "Normal" versus "Luxury" Good
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
賴靜瑤, 楊建成
C. Y. Irene Lai , C. C. Yang
頁碼/Pagination
1-14
摘要/Abstract

Kristrom and Riera (1996) 發現歐洲各國消費者對環境品質改善願付價格的所得彈性普遍地皆介於0和1之筒,因而認為環境品質為正常財;然而根據OECD各國投入環境改善支出的所得彈性顯著地大於1的實證數據, Pearce and Palmer (2001)認為環境晶質應為奢侈財。本文藉由建構一個直覺上易理解的靜態模型成功地調和並解釋 Kristrom and Riera (1996) 在lPearce and Palmer (2001)兩個看似矛盾的實證現象。

This note considers a simple model in which we reconcile two seemingly contradictory findings on environmental quality: Kristrom and Rie凹's (1996) “normal" good versus Pearce and Palmer's (2001) “luxury" good. 

關鍵字/Keyword
環境品質, 正常財, 奢侈財
environmental quality, normal good, luxury good
學科分類/Subject
經濟學
Economics
主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • Poltical Preference Function and Public Pricing
  • The Financial Condition of a Fully Funded National Pension Program in Taiwan
  • The Conception of a Viable National Pension Program—Considering the Effects of Population Change, Labor Force Participation and Financial Arrangements
  • Product Innovation and Production in Durable Goods Monopoly
  • Recent Reforms in Public Pension Programs and Lessons for Taiwan

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2026. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3