Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 33, Number 03
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2021 / September Volume 33 No.3
Strategic Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility and the Privatization Neutrality Theorem

Number of Clicks:2313; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of Full Text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
2021 / September
中英文篇名/Title
策略性環境企業社會責任與民營化中立性定理
Strategic Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility and the Privatization Neutrality Theorem
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
侯雨君, 翁堃嵐, 郭虹瑩
Yu-chun Hou, K. L. Glen Ueng, Horn-in Kuo
頁碼/Pagination
425-449
摘要/Abstract

既存探討民營化中立性定理(privatization neutrality theorem)的文獻忽略了 近年來相當受到企業重視的環境企業社會責任(environmental corporate social responsibility, ECSR)。有鑒於此,本文建構一個公、民營企業皆進行ECSR活動的混合寡占模型重新探討民營化中立性定理。依據我們的研究結果顯示:(1) 民營化中立性定理是否成立取決於生產活動是否具有外部性。當生產不具外部 性時,民營化中立性定理成立,反之,則不成立。(2)當污染的邊際損害很大且ECSR效果並不顯著時,政府的最適政策將為課稅而非補貼。(3)當生產具外部性時,即使考慮ECSR活動,民營化對社會福祉而言仍是不利的。

The existing literature on the privatization neutrality theorem ignores strategic environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR), which has received considerable attention recently. To fill this gap, this paper constructs a mixed duopolistic model to re-examine the privatization neutrality theorem, in which both public and private enterprises can strategically carry out ECSR activities to increase consumers’ willingness to pay for their products. The results of our research indicate that: (i) Whether or not the privatization neutrality theorem holds is contingent upon the externality of the production activities. When the production activities have no externality, the privatization neutrality theorem will still hold, otherwise, it will not. (ii) When the production activities have externality, privatization still has a negative impact on overall social welfare. (iii) When the marginal damage of pollution is huge and the ECSR effect is not significant, the optimal policy will be taxation rather than subsidy.

關鍵字/Keyword
混合寡占, 民營化, 民營化中立性定理, 環境企業社會責任
mixed oligopoly, privatization, privatization neutrality theorem, strategy environmental corporate social responsibility
學科分類/Subject
經濟學
Economics
主題分類/Theme

DOI
10.53106/1018189X2021093303002
檔案下載/Download
Abstract Full Text
相關文章
  • Adam Ferguson's Social Philosophy: Exposition and Assessment
  • Successive Monopoly and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Vertical Differentiation Approach
  • Does Deliberation Foster Civic Activism? Public Deliberation, Social Capital and Political Engagement
  • Designing and Evaluating Flexible Government
  • Mixed Bloods in a Plural Society: Recovering the Place of Hybridized ‘Chinese’ in Indonesia’s Port Communities

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3