Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 33, Number 03
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2021 / September Volume 33 No.3
The Paradox of Political Liberalism and the Relevance of Martin Luther

Number of Clicks:2645; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of Full Text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
2021 / September
中英文篇名/Title
政治自由主義之悖論與馬丁路德神學之當代意義
The Paradox of Political Liberalism and the Relevance of Martin Luther
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
魏楚陽
Chu-yang Wei
頁碼/Pagination
491-527
摘要/Abstract

本文研究宗教改革家馬丁路德(Martin Luther)思想之中的信仰與政治自由之間的內在關連性。路德在其宗教改革著作之中,強調信仰的內在自由,對於政治自由的看法,卻是充滿了疑慮。但是在啟蒙運動之後,路德神學逐漸發展出一套獨特的政治自由論述。不同於啟蒙運動者所強調的以個體主體性為基礎的權利主張,路德神學以人的有限性為基礎,反對政治權力的絕對化,並且主張對於社會中的多元性與差異性的尊重;然而此種自由論述,不僅在世俗化社會之中並未得到太多的理解,即使在教會之中,亦未受到足夠的重視。   

In this research paper, I discuss the inner relationship between belief and political freedom in Martin Luther’s thought. In Luther’s Reformation writings, he underlines the inner freedom of belief, yet he criticizes the concept of political freedom. After the enlightenment, Lutheran theology developed its unique argument of political freedom. Based on the imperfection of humans, political power should be restricted. Accordingly, plurality and differences in society ought to be respected. But it seems this argument of political freedom is not well understood in secular states and Christian churches.

關鍵字/Keyword
馬丁路德, 宗教改革, 啟蒙運動, 主體性, 現代國家, 自由主義
Martin Luther, Reformation, Enlightenment, subjectivity, modern state, liberalism
學科分類/Subject
政治學
Political Science
主題分類/Theme

DOI
10.53106/1018189X2021093303004
檔案下載/Download
Abstract Full Text
相關文章
  • ‘Create Citizens, and You Have Everything You Need’? On Rousseau's Freedom, Patriotism and the Paradox of Actualizing Republic
  • The Realist Moment in Marxist Theory of New Imperialism
  • Toleration in a Liberal Democratic Society
  • The Concepts of Needs and Social Welfare: Socialism, Liberalism, and the British Welfare State
  • The Challenges and Destiny of Liberalism: On Friedrich Naumann’s Reconstruction of the German Liberal Tradition

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3