Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 35, Number 04
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2023 / December Volume 35 No.4
A Preliminary Study on the Social Context, Cross-Networking and Voting Behavior of the Hakka Group: The Case of Taiwan’s 2020 Presidential Election

Number of Clicks:4157; Number of Full Text Downloads:289; Number of Abstract Downloads:19;

發刊日期/Published Date
2023 / December
中英文篇名/Title
初探客家族群的社會脈絡、交叉網絡與投票行為:以2020年臺灣總統選舉為例
A Preliminary Study on the Social Context, Cross-Networking and Voting Behavior of the Hakka Group: The Case of Taiwan’s 2020 Presidential Election
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
湯晏甄
Yen-chen Tang
頁碼/Pagination
803-849
摘要/Abstract

不同的社會脈絡下,政治立場不一致的人際網絡是否影響客家族群的投票行為?乃本文的問題意識。本文援引Mutz(2002a; 2002b)的「交叉網絡」概念,分析2020年總統選舉,不同社會脈絡下,人際網絡「交叉壓力」對客家族群的投票行為的影響。透過TEDS 2020資料分析結果顯示,在社會脈絡與社會網絡的共同作用下,居住在非「客家文化重點發展區」的客家選民較不去投票。此外,選民面臨的交叉壓力愈大,愈會改變投票抉擇,此現象在非「客家文化重點發展區」的客家族群中較為明顯。至於「客家文化重點發展區」的客家族群,則未因交叉壓力愈大而愈會改變投票抉擇。

Under different social contexts, do interpersonal network interactions with inconsistent political positions affect the political behavior of the Hakka? This article deals with this issue, employing “cross-cutting networks” as its theoretical structure. Subsequently, it endeavors to amend it based on the social context of the Hakka group, with the aim of applying it to the political situation in Taiwan. Based on analysis of the TEDS 2020, the results show that Hakka voters who live outside of major Hakka cultural areas tended not to vote. In addition, the greater the cross-pressure that voters faced, the more they were to change their voting choice. This phenomenon was more obvious among the Hakka voters who live outside of major Hakka cultural areas. As for the Hakka voters who live in the major Hakka cultural areas, they did not change their voting choice due to increased cross-pressure.

關鍵字/Keyword
社會脈絡, 交叉網絡, 客家文化重點發展區
social context, cross-cutting networks, major Hakka Cultural areas
學科分類/Subject
政治學, 社會學
Political Science, Sociology
主題分類/Theme

DOI
10.53106/1018189X202201001
檔案下載/Download
Full Text Abstract
相關文章
  • Cross-Cutting Networks and Political Particiation: Lessons of the 2001 County Magistrate, City Mayoral and Legislative Yuan Elections in Taiwan
  • Adam Ferguson's Social Philosophy: Exposition and Assessment
  • Policy-Analysis of Taiwan's Hakka Campaign
  • Plural Democracy, Political Inclusion, and Policy Responsiveness: The Pollution of Taiwan Alkali Industrial Corp
  • Text Mining for Social Studies: Meaning-based Document Classification and Its Problems

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3