Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 01, Number 01
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
1988 / November Volume 1 No.1
Conflicts and Compromise between Legal Authority and Ethical Ideas: From the Perspectives of Revenge in Han Times

Number of Clicks:2241; Number of Abstract Downloads:4; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
1988 / November
中英文篇名/Title
法律權威與倫理觀念的衝突與妥協-從漢代的復仇風氣談起
Conflicts and Compromise between Legal Authority and Ethical Ideas: From the Perspectives of Revenge in Han Times
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
李貞德
Jen-Der Lee
頁碼/Pagination
359-408
摘要/Abstract

自秦統一天下,一反周代禮樂敎化,而以法律施政。然而秦祚短暫,漢代秦而興,在承續秦制之餘,又思恢復古典道德,因此造成法律權威與倫理觀念之間的衝突,其中最有趣的便是復仇的風尙。復仇的觀念,在古代社會中相當普遍,然而各個社會中對於復仇的責任和對象,却有不同規定。中國自先秦時代起,士人學者在論及血屬復仇時,大多將復仇的責任限制在大功以內的親屬 (例如從父昆弟) 身上,並不濫施於全族人;而復仇的對象,則是仇人本身,不像某些社會容許對仇人親屬報仇。復仇的習俗,雖然自古就有,但在法律機構發達之後,國家爲掌握人民的生命權,不得不壓制這種風氣。有些社會,靠著法律權威和學說思想的幫助,得以有效地抑制私相報復的現象;但在中國,至少到漢末都未能將復仇之俗連根拔起。究其原因,當由於漢代政府在施行法律的同時,又提倡孝父悌弟的倫理。倫理觀念既滲入律令之中,也影響執法者的心態。復仇既有倫理基礎,便難以法律來扼止。到曹魏時,法令律例對於為父兄復仇的案子,也不得不採取某種程度的妥協了。

It was in the Ch'in dynasty ( 221-207 B. C. ) that the written laws, instead of feudal rituals, were carried out all over China. After succeeding Ch'in, Han rulers ( 206 B. C. -220 A. D. ) adopted Ch'in laws on the one hand and tried to restore ancient morality on the other, thus causing conflicts between laws which  represented the legal authority of the government, and ethical ideas which represented ancient moral standards of the people. One of these conficts was the custom of revenge. There are two major points presented in this paper. First, instead of getting all line­age members involved, from the 3rd century B.C. on, Chinese people had ideologically started to confine the object of revenge to the slayer himself; and the obligation of revenge to limited family members. Second, from the beginning of the empire, the Chinese government endeavored to suppress the revenge custom, which did not stop at least till the 3rd century A. D. The major interpretation to this should have been lay in the two self-contradictory policies that the Han government promoted: the legal authority, and the ethical ideas. With the promotion of filial piety and fraternal love, on the one hand, and the growing Confucian influence on governmental benevolence, both on modifying the punishment and on official mentality, on the other, avengers kept being pardoned and revenge cases kept happeing. Till the 3rd century A.D. the government finally issued compromises to certain revenge cases which had been sancitioned in the ancient Classics, ie. avenging family members such as one's parents and brothers.

關鍵字/Keyword

學科分類/Subject

主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • Author's statement 2
  • Government Intervention and Industrial Conflict: Comparative Policy Research
  • Functions and Dogmatics of Fundamental Rights
  • A Study on the Academic Freedom and Autonomy of Universities: A Critical Analysis of the Council of Grand Justices' Interpretation No. 380
  • Theories of Political Market and the Commodification of the Political Process

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3