Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 01, Number 01
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
1988 / November Volume 1 No.1
The Community Question Revisited: The Social Networks of American Urbanites, Suburbanites, and Ruralites

Number of Clicks:1126; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
1988 / November
中英文篇名/Title
社區問題再探:美國都市居民、近郊居民及鄉村居民之社會網絡
The Community Question Revisited: The Social Networks of American Urbanites, Suburbanites, and Ruralites
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
蔡勇美, 賴澤涵
Yung-Mei Tsai, Jeh-Hang Lai
頁碼/Pagination
409-427
摘要/Abstract

本文是以國家意見硏究中心( NORC ) 所做之「社會普査」1985年社會網路資料爲據,對Wellman所提出之「社區問題」做進一步的檢驗與探討。「社區問題」曾由 Wellman本人率先以 East York 的網絡資料檢測之。其後,蔡勇美與 Sigelman 二人也以 NORC所做「社會普査」中的「社交性項目」作檢驗。筆者認爲新獲之有關 National  Representation Sample網絡資料,當能更完備的檢測由「社區問題」所演出的假設,故撰寫此文。分析結果顯示:本研究與前述兩項研究有一般的共同結論,當然也發現了一些差異點。但是,儘管此一硏究有前者所未得之發現,然三者間之優劣問題,則未有決定性之定論。爲往後之努力計,本文對「社會普査」中網絡資料之性質與一般性的社區問題,也提出了一些批評與建議。

Using the 1985 social network data collected in the General Social Survey conducted by the NORC, this paper reexamines the issue of 'the community question' formulated and first tested by Wellman ( 1979 ) with his East York network data and later by Tsai and Sigelman ( 1982 ) with sociability items from the General Social Survey data also by the NORC. The main reason for doing this is because this newly obtained network data on national representative sample is more appropriate and complete in testing the hypotheses derived from the issue of 'the community question' than those previous studies the results of our analysis show some general similar results to those found in the previous studies using regional or non-network data though some differences were also found. In general, no conclusive or consistent support for the three different competing interpreta­tions is found, although some rather interesting results that were not revealed in those previous studies were found. Some critiques and suggestions concerning the nature of the network data in the General Social Survey and the community question in general were made and raised for future efforts.

關鍵字/Keyword

學科分類/Subject

主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • Introduction: Special Section on Microeconomics
  • Editor's Report
  • Effects of Social Ties and Social Media on the Sunflower Movement: Comment on "The Coming of Networked Social Movements?"
  • The Recruitment of Teachers in Taiwan during the Early Postwar Period, 1945-1947
  • Integrity and Corruption: The Perspective of the K'ang-hsi Emperor

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3