Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 08, Number 01
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
1996 / March Volume 8 No.1
On Prohibiting Monopolies from Abusing Their Market Power

Number of Clicks:2509; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
1996 / March
中英文篇名/Title
析論獨占事業濫用市場地位之禁止
On Prohibiting Monopolies from Abusing Their Market Power
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
劉孔中
Kung-Chung Liu
頁碼/Pagination
227-263
摘要/Abstract

公平交易法第十條對獨占事業之規範,採所謂的防弊主義立法體例,即不禁止獨占事業,而禁止獨占行為。本文探討本條及其相關規定之三次草案立法沿革及未來之修正草案,析論獨占事業的相關問題,參酌美國、德國、歐體之法制,界定濫用市場地位之行為的意義,並整理出濫用行為之二大類型(封鎖競爭式的濫用及榨取式的濫用)及其具體之態樣(例如拒絕交易丶操縦價格、聯合行為丶阻礙性質的投資、濫訴丶營造寡占性的市場條件、價格之濫用、交易條件之濫用丶搭售、持續遲延給付、其他不公平競爭的行為)。最後討論公平法第十條第一項第四款之合憲性問題。

Article 10 of the Fair Trade Law prohibits monopolistic enterprises from abusing their market power, violation of the provision being criminally punishable by up to three years of imprisonment. In its abstract wording and criminal consequences Article 10 resembles Section 2 of Shermann Act. But it also bears a German GWB-origin. This paper examines and analyzes the following topics in sequence: 1. The legislative history—including the admendment draft proposed by the government— of this article. 2. The issues related to monopolistic enterprises, such as the definition of the term, their identification and distinction from monopolistic conduct, and the relevant authority that classifies them as monopolies. The definition of the market is too big an issue to be treated in this paper. 3. The meaning and types of the abuse of market power. 4. The constitutionality of Item 4, Subparagraph 1 of Article 10.

關鍵字/Keyword

學科分類/Subject

主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • Legal Analysis of The Privatization of Government-Owned Enterprises
  • An Analytical Comparison between the Fair Trade Law and the Consumer Protection Law
  • The Unfair Methods of Competition and the Unfair or Deceptive Acts under Sec. 5 of the US FTCA
  • Introduction
  • ''Small Town Economy'' and Incipient Capitalism in Ming-Chíng China: A Reapprisal of Recent Chinese Historiography

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3