Survey Research - Method and Application
logo-Survey Research - Method and Application

Survey Research - Method and Application
logo_m-Survey Research - Method and Application

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About
  • For Authors
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Review Process
    • Editorial Policy
    • Online Submission
  • Editorial Board
  • Issues
  • Ethics
  • Contact
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Survey Research-Method and Application
TSSCI Tier 1
  • Home
  • Issues
  • October, 2004 "Survey Research—Method and Application" Volumn 16
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2004 / October No.16
Group Differences Comparison: Application of Bootstrap Approach to the Statistical Inference for Life Table Analysis
發刊日期/Published Date
2004 / October
中英文篇名/Title
群體差異比較:以生命表的統計推論為例
Group Differences Comparison: Application of Bootstrap Approach to the Statistical Inference for Life Table Analysis
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Article
作者/Author
陳信木
Hsinmu Chen
頁碼/Pagination
37-71
摘要/Abstract

群體之間的差異(group difference),乃是社會研究的核心焦點;尤其,近來對於生命歷程發展的關注,更是強調探討不同群體之間的社會行為差異。現在,社會研究大量援用樣本(sample)實證資料,因此,立基於樣本資料所發現之群體差異經驗的結果,如果試圖概化至母體(population)時,必須運用適切的統計推論知識。樣本推論母體的知識,在抽樣調查研究領域已經高度成熟發展,所以社會研究者進行群體差異比較推論時,可以適切仰賴這些成熟的理論知識。然而,近年來社會研究領域內一些新的發展趨勢,卻使得此一局面產生變化,進而衍生若干統計推論上的困境。基於這些和當前社會研究發展趨勢考量,本文試圖以「生命表函數之統計推論」為例,探討應用再抽樣途徑(resampling approach)進行非參數式之統計推論的可能策略,作為根據樣本發現推論母體之群體差異經驗的可行方法。

生命表方法已經是人口研究的標準工具,而且現在生命表方法更是廣泛應用至不同的研究議題上,目的不僅只是探討群體的存活經驗,研究者經常更是希望比較群體之間存活經驗的風險差異。因此,生命表的統計推論需求必然更加迫切。在本文中,我們引用Bootstrap再抽樣方法作為生命表函數比較的途徑,從實證分析的結果來看,Bootstrap的確相當合適於作為生命表函數比較的工具。其次,在此可以發現,即使是類似生命表此種成熟發展的分析工具,也會面臨統計推論困境。那麼社會研究試圖比較群體差異時,其所援用的統計分析工具或是樣本實證資料,可能遭遇更為困難的局面。在此狀況之下,類如本文使用Bootstrap再抽樣模擬途徑,或是其他的非參數式統計推論策略,就是很好的解決方案之一。

Group differences have been a major focus in social research. Typically, group differences are based solely on comparisons of expectancies, i.e., the expected pattern of behavior for the average individual in a group. Because these comparisons are substantive and not statistical, questions of whether groups are statistically different in their life course behavior patterns remain unanswered. Nowadays, sociological, findings for group differences are typically derived from large and nationally representative samples. Sampling variability is thereby introduced into the behavior model.

Moreover, social studies usually employ complex samples that make the traditional statistical inference procedures impossible. This calls for a new strategy to evaluate group differences statistically. Here, we describe one approach to statistically evaluate group differences. This approach allows researchers to estimate both the expected values and the variances for complex samples, thereby permitting formal statistical tests for group differences. We demonstrate this approach by using a multistate life table model. Traditionally, multistate life model operates at the population-level. Hence, we see the lack of attention to variability in the life table functions. Increasingly, however, demographers apply multistate life table methods to studies employing national complex samples. With the assistance of the approach we describe here, even the multistate life table method could be possibly applied to evaluate group differences.

關鍵字/Keyword
群體差異, 生命表方法, 非參數式統計推論, 再抽樣, Bootstrap模擬, 多重遞增遞減生命表
Group Differences, Life Table Method, Resampling, Increment-life Table, Bootstrap Approach, Statistical Inference
學科分類/Subject
社會學, 公共衛生與社會醫學
Sociology , Public Health and Social Medicine
主題分類/Theme

DOI
https://doi.org/10.7014/SRMA.2004100002
檔案下載/Download
Full-text
  • About
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Issues
  • Ethics
  • Contact

128 Academia Road, Section 2, Nankang, Taipei 11529, Taiwan

Tel: +886-2-2787-1816 Fax: (02)2788-1740 Email: srcsr@gate.sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2026. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3