Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 11, Number 02
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
1999 / June Volume 11 No.2
Rights to Bargain and Strike of Teachers' Associations in the Public Sector

Number of Clicks:2448; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
1999 / June
中英文篇名/Title
從勞動三權觀點論公共部門教師會協商權與罷工權
Rights to Bargain and Strike of Teachers' Associations in the Public Sector
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
衛民
Michael M. Wei
頁碼/Pagination
265-299
摘要/Abstract

團結權、協商權和罷工權是民間部門勞工基本權利,1970年代之後這些權利逐漸賦予公共部門員工。對於敎師而言,團結權已普遍適用,但由於公共部門具有主權、獨佔性產品,以及公共利益等三大特質,協商權和罷工權仍受到不同程度的限制。我國敎師已享有團結權和部份的協商權,但罷工權仍完全受限制。本研究調査發現,公立學校敎師會理事長和校長都支持敎師會擁有協商權,但罷工權部份校長表示強烈反對,而敎師會理事長也有四成反對比率。本硏究認爲協商權應賦予敎師,但協商範圍要加以適當地限制,至於罷工權則不宜行使,但要有申訴和爭議處理制度予以配合。

Rights to organize, bargain and strike are three fundamental rights of the workers in the private sector. These rights were extended to public employees beginning in the 1970s. The public sector's three char­acteristics are: to guard the public interest, to guard government sovereignty, and to guarantee the public control of the distribution of goods and services. Taiwanese teachers in the public schools have the right to organize, but rights to bargain and strike are still restricted to some extent. From this survey we find that the presidents of teachers' associations and principals of public schools in Taiwan generally agree that teachers have the right to bargain. The principals of the public schools strongly disagree however that teachers have the right to strike that forty percent of the association president respondents also disagree. This study suggests the right to bargain should be extended to teachers but with a properly limited bargaining scope. The right to strike is not a proper means for teachers to pursue their economic and social benefits.

關鍵字/Keyword
公共部門, 敎師會, 協商權, 罷工權
Public Sector, Teachers' Associations, Right to Bargain, Right to Strike
學科分類/Subject

主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • What Change of Citizenship? Difference between Before and After the Second Party Alternation in Taiwan
  • Does Deliberation Foster Civic Activism? Public Deliberation, Social Capital and Political Engagement
  • Ought Social Rights to be Protected by the State? On Some Contemporary Cirticisms of Social Rights
  • Differences in Job Satisfaction among Public and Private Sector Employees in Taiwan: Sector-specific Tenure as a Moderator

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3