Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 26, Number 03
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2014 / September Volume 26 No.3
A Genealogy of the Idea of Liberty in Taiwan: Fo-chuan Chang, Free China, and Neo-Confucianism

Number of Clicks:3203; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
2014 / September
中英文篇名/Title
五O年代臺灣自由觀念的系譜:張佛泉、《自由中國》與新儒家
A Genealogy of the Idea of Liberty in Taiwan: Fo-chuan Chang, Free China, and Neo-Confucianism
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
蕭高彥
Carl K. Y. Shaw
頁碼/Pagination
387-425
摘要/Abstract

本文運用系譜學以及脈絡主義的分析取向,以《自由與人權》成書過程為主軸,闡釋五O年代臺灣自由主義者以及新儒家對於自由的不同觀念。張佛泉的原始計畫乃是「諸權利即諸自由」的經驗主義式論述。這個觀點引起了徐復觀的批判,導致張佛泉修正其計畫,區分自由的兩個意義系統:人權保障與內心自由,並且運用觀念論來闡釋內心自由。本文同時分析殷海光對於張氏的修正有所保留,並檢視同時期牟宗三的「民主開出論」。通過系譜學的爬梳,本文呈現五O年代臺灣自由觀念的多樣面貌,去除「自由主義者主張消極自由、新儒家主張積極自由」的定見。

This article examines the formation and receptions of Fo-chuan Chang’s classic Liberties and Human Rights from the historiographical perspective. Deploying the methodologies of genealogy and contextualism, I reconstruct the different ideas of liberty in the political discourses in Taiwan in the 1950s. Contrary to the dominant interpretation, which is inspired by Isaiah Berlin’s distinction between negative and positive freedom, this article demonstrates that the early liberals in Taiwan construct an idea of negative freedom based on moral autonomy. The influence of British Idealism is also examined. Moreover, new light is shed on the well-known debates between liberals and the neo-Confucians at the time.

關鍵字/Keyword
張佛泉, 自由, 消極自由, 積極自由, 新儒家, 英國觀念論
Fo-chuan Chang, liberty, negative freedom, positive freedom, neo-Confucianism, British idealism
學科分類/Subject
政治學
Political Science
主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • The Theoretical Dilemma of “Revising Republicanism” and “Neo-Republicanism” and Its Causes
  • Toward a Reconstruction of Hegel's Ethical Liberalism
  • Ought Social Rights to be Protected by the State? On Some Contemporary Cirticisms of Social Rights
  • Toleration in a Liberal Democratic Society
  • The Concepts of Needs and Social Welfare: Socialism, Liberalism, and the British Welfare State

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2026. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3