Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 27, Number 01
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2015 / March Volume 27 No.1
The Predicament of “Education Squeeze”: An Analysis Using Online Dating Data

Number of Clicks:1465; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
2015 / March
中英文篇名/Title
「學歷擠壓」困境:擇偶網站資料的分析
The Predicament of “Education Squeeze”: An Analysis Using Online Dating Data
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
張榮富, 蔡滋紋
Jung-fu Chang, Tzu-wen Tsai, M. A.
頁碼/Pagination
205-263
摘要/Abstract

本文以擇偶網站資料,運用學歷偏好雙向互選的模擬配對方式,估算高中職、大專與碩士學歷者的擇偶機會。結果顯示:(1)碩士女與高中職男雖有比同性別其他學歷者更寬的學歷偏好門檻但卻有較小的擇偶機會,陷入「學歷擠壓」的擇偶困境。(2)唯有當「異性的」學歷偏好放寬時此二群體的擇偶機會才會大幅提升,其擇偶機會並非操之在己。(3)短期內不易透過「碩士女嫁大專男」與「高中職男娶大專女」的婚配組合疏解此二群體的擇偶困境。本文推測「現在」適婚年齡層高學歷女性未婚比例的上升,「未來」將造成「不婚」(40或50歲未婚)的增加,非僅止於「晚婚」。

This study used data from an online dating site to examine the effects of educational mating preference on marriage opportunities using a two-side matching simulation approach. We found that higher-educated women and lowereducated men have the lowest marriage opportunities among all educational groups. This may be one of the important reasons why these two educational groups have the lowest marriage rate in their gender. Furthermore, through different types of simulation, we found that even setting wider educational thresholds would not lead higher-educated women’s and lower-educated men’s marriage opportunities to increase. Only when the opposite genders set lower ceilingeducational thresholds could their marriage opportunities increase. The key factor for increasing marriage opportunities is not in their own hands.

關鍵字/Keyword
擇偶機會, 婚姻市場, 婚姻擠壓, 學歷配對, 婚姻斜坡
marriage opportunity, marriage market, marriage squeeze, educational match, marriage gradient
學科分類/Subject
社會學
Sociology
主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • From Institution to Companionship? Marriage Types and Marriage Quality among Married Women
  • Reply
  • Intermarriages around the Hoklo-Hakka Borders, 1905-1945
  • A Preliminary Study of Premarital Pregnancy in Guanxi during the Japanese Colonial Period
  • Public Attitudes toward Marriage Migrants in Taiwan: The Ten-Year Change, 2004–2014

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3