Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 30, Number 03
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2018 / September Volume 30 No.3
Pension Liberalisation? Institutional Change of the Japanese Corporate Pension System

Number of Clicks:3733; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
2018 / September
中英文篇名/Title
年金自由化?—日本企業年金體系的制度變遷
Pension Liberalisation? Institutional Change of the Japanese Corporate Pension System
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
葉崇揚
Chung-yang Yeh
頁碼/Pagination
349-393
摘要/Abstract

日本於2001年引進確定給付和確定提撥企業年金法,這是否代表日本企業年金體系呈現自由化的轉變呢?本文以比較資本主義觀點為基礎,指出日本面臨經濟自由化與困境時,行動者受制於日本二重構造體系而採取雙元化策略:一方面,維持一定比例的核心勞動者,讓他們享有DB制企業年金,作為日本企業在全球市場的比較競爭優勢;另一方面,提高非典型勞工的比例,以增加彈性化和降低企業生產成本,則是依賴DC制企業年金和公共福利。因此,日本企業年金體系是逐漸呈現雙元化的趨勢,而非自由化。

Japan introduced the Defined-Benefit Corporate Pension Act and DefinedContribution Corporate Pension Act in 2001. Did this liberalise Japan’s corporate pension system? This article based on the Comparative Capitalism Perspective endeavours to show that Japan adapted the dualist strategy due to its institutional legacies in the face of economic liberalisation and difficulties. On the one hand, a portion of core workers are maintained for comparative institutional advantages in the global market, and DB corporate pensions are provided for core workers. On the other hand, the number of non-regular workers is increasing to increase flexibility and reduce labour cost, and they usually rely on DC Corporate pensions and public welfare. Therefore, the transformation of the Japanese corporate pension system is dualisation rather than liberalisation.

關鍵字/Keyword
自由化, 雙元化, 企業年金, 日本, 比較資本主義
liberalisation, dualisation, corporate pension, Japan, comparative capitalism
學科分類/Subject
社會學
Sociology
主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • Actors or Structure? —A New Explanation of the Labour Pension Reform in Taiwan
  • Democracy, Capitalism and Pension Development in Taiwan
  • Economic Growth and Democracy: Some Empirical Evidence in Taiwan
  • Li Ta-chao and the Rise of Marxism in China
  • Toward a Reconstruction of Hegel's Ethical Liberalism

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2026. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3