Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 34, Number 02
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2022 / June Volume 34 No.2
The Insider Licensor’s Licensing Strategy under Real and Virtual Competition

Number of Clicks:1277; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of Full Text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
2022 / June
中英文篇名/Title
網路與實體廠商競爭下的產業內授權
The Insider Licensor’s Licensing Strategy under Real and Virtual Competition
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
王羿傑, 梁文榮, 王光正
Yi-Jie Wang, Wen-Jung Liang, Kuang-Cheng Andy Wang
頁碼/Pagination
233-269
摘要/Abstract

本文探討網路與實體廠商競爭下的產業內授權行為。我們得到下列幾項結論:第一、在只考慮獨家授權下,若單位運輸費率相對等待成本大(小)時,授權廠商以固定權利金授權網路(實體)廠商。第二、在只考慮非排他授權(授權兩家廠商)下,單位權利金授權、混合授權與固定權利金授權皆可能發生。第三、對授權廠商來說,授權兩家廠商原則上優於授權一家廠商。但當授權廠商邊際成本夠高,且等待成本相對運輸成本夠大時,授權廠商單獨授權實體廠商下的總利潤會高於授權兩家廠商下的總利潤。

We combine the barbell model in Liang et al. (2006) and the characteristic of the online firm in Guo and Lai (2014, 2017) to analyze the intra-industry licensing strategy under real and virtual competition. We obtain the following interesting results. First, given exclusive licensing, the licensor will choose fixed-fee licensing to the online (physical) firm, if the transport rate relative to the online firm’s waiting cost is large (small). Second, given non-exclusive licensing, all of the royalty, mixed, and fixed-fee licensing can occur, depending upon two key factors, the licensor’s marginal cost and the differential of the waiting cost and transport rate. Third, non-exclusive licensing is superior to exclusive licensing, except in the case where the exclusive fixed-fee licensing to the physical firm becomes optimal when both the licensor’s marginal cost and the waiting cost relative to the transport rate are large.

關鍵字/Keyword
產業內授權, 啞鈴模型, 網路廠商, 實體廠商
Intra-industry licensing strategy, barbell model, online firm, physical firm
學科分類/Subject
經濟學
Economics
主題分類/Theme

DOI
10.53106/1018189X2022063402002
檔案下載/Download
Abstract Full Text
相關文章
  • Network Externality, Goodwill and Market Failure
  • Type of Infrastructure, Economic Integration, and Foreign Direct Investment
  • The Effects of Firm Entry and Exit on the Manufacturing Employment Flow in Taiwan
  • Are Antidumping Suits Hurting Taiwan's Downstream Industries?
  • Resource Misallocation and Firm Dynamics: The Case of DRAM Industry in Taiwan

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3