Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》Volume 37, Number 01
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2025 / March Volume 37 No.1
Contagious Democracy? A Historical Case for a Defensive Normative Approach for the EU’s Cross-Strait Policy

Number of Clicks:1813; Number of Full Text Downloads:129; Number of Abstract Downloads:13;

發刊日期/Published Date
2025 / March
中英文篇名/Title
擴散性的民主?歐盟對兩岸政策防禦性規範路徑的歷史性論證
Contagious Democracy? A Historical Case for a Defensive Normative Approach for the EU’s Cross-Strait Policy
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
Jasper Roctus
Jasper Roctus
頁碼/Pagination
137-168
摘要/Abstract

本文概述了1975年以來歐盟對兩岸關係政策的主要演變。正如本文所顯示的,如今的一些發展標誌著歐盟政策的重大轉變,在歷史上,歐盟政策的特點是外交上的無動於衷、對於害怕損害與中華人民共和國的外交關係的焦慮,以及對支持臺灣成功過渡到民主社會似乎並不感興趣。最近的轉變表明歐盟決心在全球舞臺上發揮規範性作用。正如最後一部分所主張的,「具有防禦特點的規範性」使歐盟在境外追求具有原則的「務實主義」,從而使其在與中國保持密切的經濟關係的同時,還能支持像臺灣這樣的政治同道者,最終在世界舞臺上將自己塑造成一個規範性力量。

This study provides an overview of the major evolutions in the European Union’s (EU) policy toward cross-Strait relations since 1975. Recent developments signify a major shift in the EU’s policy, which historically has been characterized by diplomatic impassivity, anxiety about jeopardizing relations with the People’s Republic of China (PRC), and seemingly little interest in supporting Taiwan’s successful transition to democracy. The recent change of tack is indicative of the EU’s determination to develop a normative role on the global stage. “Defensive normativity” might enable the EU to pursue its “principled pragmatism” abroad, enabling it to maintain strong economic relations with the PRC while supporting a like-minded partner, such as Taiwan, to profile itself as a normative power on the world stage.

關鍵字/Keyword
兩岸關係, 民主, 具有原則的務實主義, 中歐關係, 規範性
cross-Strait relations, democracy, principled pragmatism, Sino–European relations, normativity
學科分類/Subject
政治學, 歷史學
Political Science, History
主題分類/Theme

DOI
10.53106/1018189X202207102
檔案下載/Download
Full Text Abstract
相關文章
  • The Challenges and Destiny of Liberalism: On Friedrich Naumann’s Reconstruction of the German Liberal Tradition
  • The Ifugao Indigenous People’s Education Center: Pioneering Community-led Heritage Conservation
  • The Women Who Guarded the Ancestral Fire: Sovereign Practices of Indigenous Women after Typhoon Morakot
  • Can Hobbes's Political Theory Be Applied to Normative International Theory? In Defense of a "Revisionist" Approach
  • Popular Sovereignty and Dernocracy: An Interpretation of Carl Schrnitt's Theory of Dernocracy

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3