Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Forthcoming Papers
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
Axial Age Thesis and the Religious Elements in Early Chinese Thought: A Study on the Writings of Three Scholars

Number of Clicks:516; Number of Full Text Downloads:42;

發刊日期/Published Date
中英文篇名/Title
軸心時代概念與古代中國思想中的宗教元素:一個學術史的考察
Axial Age Thesis and the Religious Elements in Early Chinese Thought: A Study on the Writings of Three Scholars
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
傅揚
Yang Fu
頁碼/Pagination
-
摘要/Abstract

本文以余英時(1930–2021)、張灝(1936–2022)和陳來(1952–)三位學者的著作為據,分析他們如何理解並發揮「軸心時代」(the Axial Age)的理論,以闡釋古代中國思想文化中的宗教元素。要言之,余英時強調軸心突破後中國「內向超越」所蘊含的宗教性;張灝斷言中國的「不完全超越」形塑後世政教合一的傾向;陳來則凸顯古代中國思想文化的延續性和人文性,質疑軸心突破的觀點。本文認為,透過此學術史考察,我們不僅能更全面理解宗教在古代中國思想傳統中的重要性,也能對近代學人的研究關懷,以及宏大理論和經驗研究的互動,增添更深刻的認識。

This article critically examines the works of YU Ying-shi (1930–2021), CHANG Hao (1936–2022), and CHEN Lai (1952–), focusing on their application of the “Axial Age” thesis to interpret the religious dimensions of early Chinese thought. YU highlights the religiosity inherent in the “inward transcendence” that emerged in Chinese thought following the Axial breakthrough. CHANG posits that China’s “incomplete transcendence” facilitated the enduring unity of state and religion throughout its history. In contrast, CHEN emphasizes the continuity and humanistic orientation of early Chinese thought and culture, thereby ques-tioning the validity of the Axial breakthrough thesis. This article suggests that such an examination not only enhances our understanding of the religious ele-ments in early Chinese thought but also deepens our comprehension of the his-tory of modern scholarship and the interaction between grand theories and spe-cific case studies.

關鍵字/Keyword
軸心時代, 軸心突破, 古代中國, 宗教思想, 比較文明史
the Axial age, the Axial breakthrough, early China, religious thought, comparative history of civilizations
學科分類/Subject
政治學, 歷史學
Political Science, History
主題分類/Theme

DOI
10.53106/1018189X202501001
檔案下載/Download
Full Text
相關文章
  • How Could Rousseau’s Civil Religion Help Us Understand the Conflict of Beliefs in Modern Political Life?
  • China Discourse from the Late Twentieth Century: A Dialogue between International Relations and History
  • Generational Politics in Taiwan Revisited: Application of a Cross-Classified Random Effects Model, 1995–2010
  • An Empirical Study on Cost Efficiency of Domestic Banking in Taiwan-An Application of the Stochastic Frontier Model
  • Actors or Structure? —A New Explanation of the Labour Pension Reform in Taiwan

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2026. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3