Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Forthcoming Papers
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
Why E-Portfolio Is Controversial: How Deliberation May Avoid a Fantasy Document

Number of Clicks:326; Number of Full Text Downloads:13;

發刊日期/Published Date
中英文篇名/Title
惹人爭議的學習歷程檔案:審議如何可能避免夢幻文件
Why E-Portfolio Is Controversial: How Deliberation May Avoid a Fantasy Document
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
林祐聖
Yu-Sheng Lin
頁碼/Pagination
-
摘要/Abstract

學習歷程檔案的運作引起諸多的批評,從夢幻文件的概念出發,本文探究兩個問題。首先,為何一個具有豐富資源的組織,會制定在象徵上能夠解決當前的教育難題,卻不易在實際上達成目標的計畫。其次,審議討論能否成為降低計畫的夢幻性的方式。以「未來議起來」為案例,本文發現,夢幻計畫的成因在於組織對於問題的不知,審議討論可擴充對於問題的掌握,增加計畫的實用性並提升參與者對於組織的信心。雖然審議外包能在短期降低計畫的夢幻性,組織仍應該培養民主創新能力,改變組織制定計劃的體質,常態化的減少政策的夢幻程度。

The E-Portfolio (EP) is a controversial reform of senior high school education. This study explored two puzzles from the perspective of a fantasy document. First, why does a resourceful organization create a plan with high symbolic meaning but low instrumental function? Second, is deliberation a cure for avoiding a fan-tasy document? Taking the deliberation plan on EP as a case study, this study argues that a fantasy document results from an organization’s lack of familiarity with the issue and its inability to obtain sufficient information. This study argues that deliberation is an efficient tool for enhancing the symbolic and pragmatic functions of plans. While outsourcing deliberation can decrease the fantasy of the plan in a short period, this study suggests that the organization should be more actively involved in the deliberation process to develop democratic innovation capacity and transform the configuration of plan-making within the organization.

關鍵字/Keyword
夢幻文件, 審議民主, 學習歷程檔案, 108課綱, 未來議起來
fantasy document, deliberative democracy, e-portfolio, Curriculum Guidelines of 12–Year Basic Education, conversation for future
學科分類/Subject
社會學
Sociology
主題分類/Theme

DOI
10.53106/1018189X202407002
檔案下載/Download
Full Text
相關文章
  • Does Deliberation Foster Civic Activism? Public Deliberation, Social Capital and Political Engagement
  • Deliberation in Social Movement: A Comparison of the D-Street in the Sunflower Movement and the General Assembly in the Wild Strawberry Movement
  • Autonomy and Democracy
  • Participatory Budgeting with Enclave Deliberation: A Case Study of a Project on Disability Employment Promotion
  • Popular Sovereignty and Dernocracy: An Interpretation of Carl Schrnitt's Theory of Dernocracy

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3