Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Forthcoming Papers
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
Spatial Governance and Institutional Exclusion in the Energy Transition: The Case of Māori Geothermal Development in New Zealand

Number of Clicks:77; Number of Full Text Downloads:4;

發刊日期/Published Date
中英文篇名/Title
能源轉型下的空間治理與制度性排除:以紐西蘭毛利地熱開發經驗為例
Spatial Governance and Institutional Exclusion in the Energy Transition: The Case of Māori Geothermal Development in New Zealand
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
鄭安廷, 蕭恩昕
An-Ting Cheng, En-Hsin Hsiao
頁碼/Pagination
-
摘要/Abstract

本研究以紐西蘭毛利族的地熱開發為例,檢視能源轉型如何透過空間治理延續殖民性排除。紐西蘭雖已納入毛利參與機制,惟其「制度化賦權」相當脆弱,高度依賴政治氛圍。研究發現殖民歷史深刻形塑了土地治理架構,原住民族主體性持續被邊緣化;空間治理把文化土地轉化為「可治理資源」;形式參與多半停留在諮詢層次,缺乏實質賦權。2023年右翼政府上台後的政策倒退,印證了這種賦權的不穩定性。鑑此,公正轉型須把原住民族治理權制度化為具法律約束力的權力安排,去殖民能源治理方可能真正落實,也為臺灣原住民族地熱政策的發展提供借鏡。

This research aims to understand how energy transition policies exclude Indigenous peoples in the same way colonial regimes have, using Māori geothermal development in New Zealand as the main case study. Although Māori people have been included in New Zealand’s resource management systems, this inclusion is structurally weak and depends on the government in power. The three findings include: colonial history is embedded in land governance frameworks that exclude Indigenous cultural identities; land governance tends to transform land into an administrative means of generating revenue; and formal channels of participation do not provide Māori communities with the power to enforce the decision-making processes. The findings conclude that, for a just energy transition, Indigenous governance rights must be adopted in a legally binding manner.

關鍵字/Keyword
公正轉型, 去殖民能源治理, 空間治理, 原住民族主權, 毛利族
just transition, decolonial energy governance , spatial governance, Indigenous sovereignty, Māori
學科分類/Subject
政治
Political Science
主題分類/Theme

DOI
10.53106/1018189X202606001
檔案下載/Download
Full Text
相關文章
  • The Women Who Guarded the Ancestral Fire: Sovereign Practices of Indigenous Women after Typhoon Morakot
  • War, Nations, and Democracy: Changes in the Civic Discourses of British Idealists in the Face of Imperial Conflict
  • The Impact of Citizenship on Political Participation among Taiwan’s Public: Evidence from Two Citizenship Surveys in 2012 and 2018
  • Bosanquet's Theory of the Modern State and Civic Nation Discourse
  • Good Governing More Basic than Good Politics: Some Modern Chinese Appraisals of Liberal Democracy

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2026. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.4