Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 06, Number 02
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
1994 / June Volume 6 No.2
Civil-Military Relations in the Spring and Autumn Period

Number of Clicks:1752; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
1994 / June
中英文篇名/Title
春秋時期的政軍關係
Civil-Military Relations in the Spring and Autumn Period
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
鄭曉時
Hsiao-shih Cheng
頁碼/Pagination
167-198
摘要/Abstract

本研究的宗旨,在指陳中國春秋時期(西元前770年至481年)諸侯國在政治、軍事互動關係上所顯現的特徵,並從政治、社會變遷的角度,分析造成這些現象的原因及其所蘊含的歷史意義。研究結果指出,春秋中期之前是文武合一的時代;春秋後期時,專業將領和軍事家已經出現和受到重用。西周時,天子握有最高軍事權威;自前八世紀末至前六世紀初,軍權下移至諸侯之手;到春秋後期,再下移到卿大夫;然而,春秋時期諸侯或大夫的軍事權威,並不像後來專制君主般具有絕對性。此外,本文提出了兩個主要論點:1.西周春秋時期的軍權下移現象,是實行封建所造成的,而非封建制度的破壞所造成的;2.專業將領和軍事家的出現與受重用,應在春秋後期,而非戰國時期。

This paper adopts the approach of socio-political change to investigate some salient traits of civil-military relations in the Spring and Autumn period (770-481 B.C.). The most significant trend is the downward transference of politico-military authority from the Son of Heaven to the King of feudal states and then to the king's ministers. This trend, as this paper points out, is a natural result of Chou's feudalistic state system. In this socio-political system, civil-military affairs and personnel are integrated. It is in the late period of the Spring and Autumn (i.e., around 575-481 B.C.) that civil-military affairs and personnel began to differentiate. This paper also identifies five factors contributing to the rise of military professionals and strategists and compares three famous generals and the socio-political backgrounds in which they are situated.

關鍵字/Keyword

學科分類/Subject

主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • The State and the Military: A Framework for Analyzing Civil-Military Relations in Taiwan (1950-1987)
  • Fiscal Announcements, Rational Expectations and Economic Dynamics
  • Cross-Cutting Networks and Political Particiation: Lessons of the 2001 County Magistrate, City Mayoral and Legislative Yuan Elections in Taiwan
  • Intertemporal Policy Mix and the Dynamic Adjustment of Agricultural Product Prices
  • Economies of Scale and Density for the Taiwan Power Company

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3