SOCIETAS: A Journal for Philosophical Study of Public Affairs
logo-SOCIETAS: A Journal for Philosophical Study of Public Affairs

SOCIETAS: A Journal for Philosophical Study of Public Affairs
logo_m-SOCIETAS: A Journal for Philosophical Study of Public Affairs

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • News
  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Volumes
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Subscription
  • Contact
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
SOCIETAS: A Journal for Philosophical Study of Public Affairs
  • Home
  • Volumes
  • SOCIETAS: A Journal for Philosophical Study of Public Affairs, No 80 (2024/6)
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2024 / June No.80
Is There Progress in Morality? Steven Pinker, John Gray and Jonathan Haidt
發刊日期/Published Date
2024 / June
中英文篇名/Title
何以言道德進步?史迪芬平克、約翰葛雷與強納森海德特
Is There Progress in Morality? Steven Pinker, John Gray and Jonathan Haidt
論文屬性/Type
研究紀要 Research Notes
作者/Author
陳頌偉
Chung-Wai Chan
頁碼/Pagination
105-164
摘要/Abstract

美國哈佛大學心理學教授史迪芬平克(Steven Pinker)於2011年寫下《人性中的良善天使》,高舉理性與科學、捍衛人文主義、宣揚進步觀念、提倡道德進步說。英國思想家約翰葛雷(John Gray)專研政治哲學,退休前任倫敦政治經濟學院歐洲思想教授,2002 年寫成《稻草狗》,開門見山反人類中心說、反人文主義、反道德進步論。平克認為人類有向善的趨向,累積而成進步,葛雷反對此說。二人之辯在英語世界掀起熱議,蓋其議論觸及倫理學之根本─假若道德無所進步,勸善純屬徒勞,道德社會無從建立,則辨別善惡何益?本文對比平克和葛雷的說法,輔以美國心理學家強納森海德特(Jonathan Haidt)的論說,以說明何以平克的說法不令人滿意、及為何人類的道德處境更近於葛雷的理解。

Steven Pinker, currently a professor of psychology at Harvard University, is the author of The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined (2011). The book is a defense of key human values such as reason, science, humanism, progress and moral progressivism. John Gray is a British political philosopher who held the position of Professor of European Thought at the London School of Economics and Political Science until his retirement in 2007. Gray’s book Straw Dogs: Thoughts on Humans and Other Animals was published in 2002, unabashedly expressing his opposition to anthropocentrism, humanism and progressivism. Pinker argues that the world is getting better. The continuous accumulation leads to progress, including moral progress. Gray opposes this view. Their dispute has sparked much discussion in the English-speaking world because it touches on the core of ethics: if moral progress is non-existent, there is no hope for people to become virtuous, why should we bother distinguishing good from evil? By examining Pinker’s and Gray’s arguments, and using Jonathan Haidt’s moral psychology, I will explain why Pinker’s account is unsatisfactory; and why the human moral condition is more akin to Gray’s understanding.

關鍵字/Keyword
史迪芬平克, 約翰葛雷, 強納森海德特, 道德進步
Steven Pinker, John Gray, Jonathan Haidt, Moral Progress
學科分類/Subject

主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
PDF Full Text
熱門文章
  • Uncertainty and Right-wing Populism in Europa

    Hsiao-Mei Juan

  • Technology-mediated Daily Practices: An Analytical Framework—Cases from Blood Glucose Monitoring and Insulin Delivery Technologies

    Yu-Cheng Liu

  • Adam Smith’s Discussion of Empire and Its Context

    Jeng-Guo Chen

  • Artificial Sociality: Ethnomethodological Inquiry into Artificial Intelligence as a Social Phenomenon

    Yu-Cheng Liu

  • The Paradoxes of Sovereignty and the State of Exception: From Agamben Back to Schmitt

    Hsi-Ping Schive


相關文章
  • Book Review on Professor Wan’s A Comprehensive Guide to Das Kapital—Marx’s Philosophy of Law Revisited
  • In the Shadow of Liberalism: Locke on the Moral Problem of Property Right
  • Division of Labor, Luxury and Public Spirit: Adam Ferguson on the Crisis of Commercial Society
  • Overcoming Political Evil with People’s Sovereignty: An Exploration of Bentham’s Thought on Democratic Constitutionalism

  • News
  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Volumes
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Subscription
  • Contact

Tel: 886-2-2782-1693 Fax: (02)2785-4160

© Copyright 2026. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3