Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 12, Number 01
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2000 / March Volume 12 No.1
Theories of Poverty in the US Since 1960s: A Critical Review and an Integration

Number of Clicks:4092; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
2000 / March
中英文篇名/Title
1960s以降的美國貧窮理論:回顧與整合
Theories of Poverty in the US Since 1960s: A Critical Review and an Integration
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
呂朝賢, 王德睦
Chao-hsien Lu, Te-mu Wang
頁碼/Pagination
149-195
摘要/Abstract

本文從60年代的貧窮文化論點爲始,檢討60-90年代之間對於貧窮議題的解釋論點。我們藉由三個理論面向:缺乏取向、選擇取向與限制取向,去解析各個不同論點中的主要假定與論點之間的可能關係,並討論各個論點的限制與可能的政策意涵。檢視結果發現,各個論點中雖隱含著不同的假定,然而這些假定之間都有很密切的發展關係,在這之中貧窮文化的論點可視爲60年代以降不同貧窮理論的主要源頭,各個理論莫不是對其的補充與批判建構而成。然而,在我們所論及的論點中,對於貧窮動態的解釋卻相當薄弱或根本忽略了。因此本文的結論認爲,我們應該重新將家庭帶回貧窮的解釋之中,透過對於家庭的硏究,來補充以往理論的不足。

In this paper, we review theories of poverty over a 30-year period, namely, from the 1960s to 1990s. Theories of poverty can be grouped according to three general approaches and orientations: lack, choice, and constraint. From these there approaches we develop hypotheses specifying possible inter-relationships among poverty theories. Our analyses' findings indicate that "culture of poverty" remained the dominant theory during the 1960s to 1990s. Other theories basically either critique the "culture of poverty" concept or attempt to amend it. While many different hypotheses concerning poverty exist among the three main theories, they are nonetheless interrelated. Moreover, all these theories share a common weakness, namely, they are inadequate in accounting for poverty dynamics. Our study indicates a strong need to bring the issue of family back into the discussion on and theorizing of poverty dynamics.

關鍵字/Keyword
貪窮文化, 人力資本, 地位取得, 雨露均霑論, 情境觀點
Culture of poverty, Human Capital, State Attainment, Trickle Down Thesis, Situational perspective
學科分類/Subject
社會學
Sociology
主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • Social Assistance Dynamics in Taiwan: Trend, Type and Causes
  • Problems in Social Assistance: Policy Goals, the Definition and Measurement of Poverty
  • "Privatization of Social Welfare" and Its Implication for the Social Welfare Policy of Taiwan
  • Single Elderly Households, Single Female-Headed Households and Poverty: Poverty Spells of Low-Income Households in Chia-Yi
  • Economic Growth and Democracy: Some Empirical Evidence in Taiwan

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3