Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 17, Number 03
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2005 / September Volume 17 No.3
The Economic Incentive Effects of Combined Product Tax and Recycling Subsidy

Number of Clicks:1343; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
2005 / September
中英文篇名/Title
廢棄物回收處理費之回收處理市場及誘因效果
The Economic Incentive Effects of Combined Product Tax and Recycling Subsidy
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
溫麗琪
Lih-chyi Wen
頁碼/Pagination
491-520
摘要/Abstract

經濟學者主張在庇古稅 (Pigouvian Tax) 難以執行時,可結合課稅及補助金制度同時執行的方式有效地達成環境目的,即兩階段政策工具 (two-part instrument)。民國87年,國內成立了資源回收管理基金會(簡稱基管會),目的即在於利用兩階段政策工具確保每一項產品都能被適當地回收處理,在當前各國相繼提出「零廢棄」的目標下,國內資源回收的成效頗值得檢討。爲了瞭解政策是否能有效達成經濟誘因效果及環境目標,本研究以實證及理論結合的方式分析兩階段政策工具的政策效果,並探討民間回收處理市場的存在對環保署執行回收處理費制度的可能影響。本研究亦探討目前兩階段政策工具下之“匿報"及“溢報"的行爲。相信本文結果有助於釐清過去幾年來國內的相關政策爭論,及提供未來政策執行的方向。

In theory, the pigouvian tax (the primary incentive policy option advocated by many economists) is so difficult to implement that the use of a two-part instrument can provide an efficient means of reducing outputs and encouraging input substitution. In view of this, Taiwan established the Recycling Management Fund (RMF) system in 1998, imposing treatment and recycling fees on product items, and using the revenue from these fees to subsidize consumers, collectors and treatment firms, in order to ensure that all items are recycled. This paper draws on the results of empirical and theoretical studies to show the effects of two-part instruments, particularly the economic incentive and environmental effects, and this paper establishes an eco­nomic model to systematically analyze the behaviors of producers and recycling firms. Finally, the paper shows the direction of future studies which may focus on the development of an incentive scheme for firms to innovate effective environmental technologies.

關鍵字/Keyword
庇古稅, 資源回收處理費, 廢資訊物品, 廢潤滑油
pigouvian tax, recycling subsidy, recycling incentive, environmental technology
學科分類/Subject
經濟學
Economics
主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • Destined to Be Less Educated and Unhealthy? Testing the Impact of Natural Resources on Female Public Health and Education, 1960–2017
  • Public Administration for Sustainable Development -Self-Governance and Common-Pool Resources Management in Taiwan's Indigenous Communities
  • Evaluating the Revenue Effect of Public Investment
  • The Effect of the Minimum Wage on Employment in Taiwan: Evidence from 2013-2018
  • Exploring Social Mechanisms behind Risky Financial Investments: Social Capital and Participation in Stock Markets and Mutual Funds

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3