Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 29, Number 02
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2017 / June Volume 29 No.2
The Analysis of Labor Market Regulation Mechanisms for Movement of Natural Persons in Cross-Straits Agreement on Trade in Services

Number of Clicks:2016; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
2017 / June
中英文篇名/Title
兩岸服務貿易協議「自然人移動」的勞動市場調控機制分析
The Analysis of Labor Market Regulation Mechanisms for Movement of Natural Persons in Cross-Straits Agreement on Trade in Services
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
李健鴻
Chien-hung Lee
頁碼/Pagination
279-318
摘要/Abstract

本文採取「制度比較分析」的研究途徑,分析兩岸服務貿易協議內關於「自然人移動」的勞動市場調控機制。研究發現,臺灣依照「自然人移動」條款所建構的規範,已經形成一種「相對不平衡」的勞動市場調控機制,即兩岸服務貿易協議與現行法令,對於中國的跨國企業內部調動人員及履約人士的限制規範,相較於臺灣提交世界貿易組織的入會承諾和臺灣已簽署的其它六項自由貿易協定的限制規範,相對都比較少。建議政府應該重新檢討兩岸服務貿易協議對於中國的跨國企業內部調動人員及履約人士進入臺灣的規範,使兩岸服務貿易協議朝向臺灣提交世界貿易組織的入會承諾原則趨於一致。

This article adopts the institutional comparative research approach, and aims to analyze labor market regulation mechanisms in the Cross-Straits Agreement on Trade in Services. The finding is that Taiwan’s regulations have been relatively imbalanced according to the provisions of “cross-border mobility of natural persons”, that is, the restrictive regulations in the Cross-Straits Agreement on Trade in Services and regulations for Chinese intra-corporate transferees are fewer than Taiwan’s World Trade Organization membership commitments and the regulations of six Free Trade Agreements signed by Taiwan. There are suggestions as follows: government should review and correct the regulations for Chinese intra-corporate transferees and contractual service suppliers in the Cross-Straits Agreement on Trade in Services, and make the regulations for Chinese intra-corporate transferees and contractual service suppliers consistent with Taiwan’s World Trade Organization membership commitments.

關鍵字/Keyword
自然人移動, 勞動市場調控機制, 兩岸服務貿易協議
movement of natural persons, labor market regulation mechanisms, cross-straits agreement on trade in services
學科分類/Subject
政治學
Political Science
主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • The Impact of Signing Bilateral Free Trade Agreements on the Operations of the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation
  • The Influences of an Individualized Services Model on the Rights and Obligations of the Unemployed under Workfare Governance
  • Deliberation in Social Movement: A Comparison of the D-Street in the Sunflower Movement and the General Assembly in the Wild Strawberry Movement
  • Bureaucratic Systems and Democratic Politics: A Structural Comparison of the Taiwanese, Japanese, and U. S. Cases
  • Citizen, Consumer, State and Market

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2026. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3