Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 36, Number 04
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2024 / December Volume 36 No.4
The Political Form of the European Union and the Inter-State Social-Contract Aspect of the EU Treaties: Revisiting the Federation Theories of Pufendorf, Montesquieu and Rousseau

Number of Clicks:4519; Number of Full Text Downloads:400; Number of Abstract Downloads:9;

發刊日期/Published Date
2024 / December
中英文篇名/Title
歐盟的政治形式與 歐盟條約的「國際社會契約」面向:重訪普芬道夫、孟德斯鳩與盧梭的 聯邦政治體理論
The Political Form of the European Union and the Inter-State Social-Contract Aspect of the EU Treaties: Revisiting the Federation Theories of Pufendorf, Montesquieu and Rousseau
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
邵允鍾
Yung-Djong Shaw
頁碼/Pagination
857-902
摘要/Abstract

聯邦政治體理論兼顧對歐盟運作的現實描述、歐盟政治正當性來源的理論說明,以及歐盟未來組織改革方向的規範性指引,是當今競爭詮釋歐盟政治形式的多種嘗試中最首尾一貫的理論。然而由於此一理論陣營強調歐盟條約的憲法面向,導致其無法合理說明歐盟條約對歐盟會員國造成的身分轉變效果。藉由重返普芬道夫、孟德斯鳩與盧梭的聯邦政治體理論,本文指出歐盟條約可以被理解為同時具有國際社會契約與聯邦憲法的性質。歐盟條約因此是國家主權自願服從嚴格意義法治的具體例證。

The theory of federation provides an accurate description of EU’s functioning, a sound explanation of the source of its political legitimacy, as well as a normative guide to its future reform. It is the most coherent among various theories currently competing to answer the question of EU’s political form. Unfortunately, due to its focus on the constitutional aspect of the EU Treaties, it cannot yet properly explain the Treaties’ status-transforming effect on the EU Member States. By returning to the federation theories of Pufendorf, Montesquieu and Rousseau, this article shows that the EU Treaties can be understood as simultaneously having the qualities of an inter-state social contract and a federal constitution. The EU Treaties are therefore a concrete example of national sove­reignty willingly submitting itself to the rule of law in the strict sense.

關鍵字/Keyword
國際社會契約, 國家間社會契約, 聯邦, 全球憲政主義, 憲法多元主義, 多民民主
international social contract, inter-state social contract, federation, global constitutionalism, constitutional pluralism, demoicracy
學科分類/Subject
政治學
Political Science
主題分類/Theme

DOI
10.53106/1018189X202304003
檔案下載/Download
Full Text Abstract
相關文章
  • Populism and Development of Democratic Politics: The Case of India
  • Li Ta-chao and the Rise of Marxism in China
  • Rousseau, Kant and Perpetual Peace
  • The Concepts of Needs and Social Welfare: Socialism, Liberalism, and the British Welfare State
  • Does Deliberation Foster Civic Activism? Public Deliberation, Social Capital and Political Engagement

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3