Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》Volume 37, Number 01
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2025 / March Volume 37 No.1
The EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy and Its Actions during the Russia-Ukraine War: A Moment of Transformation?

Number of Clicks:1697; Number of Full Text Downloads:184; Number of Abstract Downloads:6;

發刊日期/Published Date
2025 / March
中英文篇名/Title
歐盟共同外交與安全政策及其對烏克蘭戰爭的政策作為:蛻變的契機?
The EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy and Its Actions during the Russia-Ukraine War: A Moment of Transformation?
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
羅至美
Chih-Mei Luo
頁碼/Pagination
235-281
摘要/Abstract

烏克蘭戰爭的發生形成對歐盟的共同外交與安全政策(CFSP)嚴格的考驗。在烏克蘭戰爭中,CFSP的政策作為出現顯著的轉變。在規模上,歐盟八波之制裁為史上最強大。在工具上,出現了準軍事工具的使用,也實現了常態性軍力建制(PESCO)。然,PESCO的有限規模並不足以使歐盟成為區域安全的強勢行為者。本文認為,歐盟應再度嘗試建立防禦共同體(EDC)。首先,烏克蘭戰爭的發生說明CFSP的規範性權力已不再足以應付地緣政治時代。其次,也惟有透過EDC的集體機制,個別會員國強化國防安全的努力始能產生整體性、加乘性的綜效,同時能安全地處理德國再軍事化此一敏感議題。

Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine severely challenged the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), compelling major changes. In terms of scale, the EU’s eight sanctions on Russia were its largest and strongest in history. In terms of policy tools, the CFSP adopted a quasi-military instrument, establishing the Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) framework. However, this study argues that PESCO’s limited scale is insufficient for the EU to become a regional security power, making now the best time to attempt the European Defense Community (EDC).

The Russia-Ukraine War proved that the CFSP’s normative approaches were no longer sufficient for Europe’s current geopolitics. The EU must ensure its own security as a regional power with full foreign policy capacity. A collective European security approach is the only way for individual EU members to enhance their military capabilities, creating holistic, multiplier effects, and safely dealing with the issue of German rearmament.

關鍵字/Keyword
歐盟, 共同外交與安全政策, 共同安全與防禦政策, 烏克蘭戰爭, 歐洲防禦共同體
the European Union (EU), common foreign and security policy (CFSP), common security and defense policy (CSDP), the Ukrainian War, European Defense Community (EDC)
學科分類/Subject
政治學
Political Science
主題分類/Theme

DOI
10.53106/1018189X202212102
檔案下載/Download
Full Text Abstract
相關文章
  • Labor Market Policy in Taiwan and in Germany: Focusing on the Employment Service Policy
  • On Aristotle's Best Regime
  • The Determinants of People's Preferences on Redistributive Policies in Taiwan
  • The Polity of the EU under the Constitutional Treaty of Europe

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3