Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 37, Number 04
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2025 / December Volume 37 No.4
Framing China in Legislative Speeches: An Analysis of Taiwan’s Main Parties

Number of Clicks:419; Number of Full Text Downloads:49; Number of Abstract Downloads:3;

發刊日期/Published Date
2025 / December
中英文篇名/Title
臺灣國會主要政黨如何論述中國議題?
Framing China in Legislative Speeches: An Analysis of Taiwan’s Main Parties
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
王奕婷
Yi-ting Wang
頁碼/Pagination
881-927
摘要/Abstract

自民主轉型以來,臺灣政黨間主要的政策競爭為與中國關係的不同立場。本文認為基於過往不同的統獨立場,臺灣兩大政黨會強調殊異的論述框架,使己方立場更具說服力。本文分析臺灣立法院在1996–2020年期間委員們關於中國議題的總質詢發言,透過「潛在語意尺度」分析發現,國民黨的立委更強調與中國交流能帶來利益,而民進黨則更頻繁提及中國對臺灣具差異和威脅。當臺灣經濟表現較不理想、而中國經濟表現較優越時,立委們更傾向將中國描述為利益所在;而產業結構上較仰賴農漁業的選區所選出的立委,也更強調中國可帶來經貿利益。

Since Taiwan’s democratic transition, its relationship with China has remained the most salient issue in party politics. Although extensive studies have examined public opinion, there has been a lack of systematic research on how political parties frame this issue rhetorically. Using the Latent Semantic Scaling model, this study analyzes the speeches of Taiwanese legislators on China-related issues from 1996 to 2020. The results show that the Kuomintang emphasizes the benefits of engagement with China, particularly highlighting “communication dialogue” and “economic benefits.” In contrast, the Democratic Progressive Party often discusses threats from China, focusing on “security” and threats to “democracy and freedom.” When Taiwan’s economic performance is less satisfactory and China’s economy appears stronger, legislators tend to emphasize the economic benefits of engagement with China. Moreover, legislators elected from districts more dependent on agriculture and fisheries tend to emphasize China’s economic opportunities.

關鍵字/Keyword
中國議題, 政黨, 論述框架, 總質詢, 文本分析
China-related issues , parties, rhetorical framing, floor speeches, text analysis
學科分類/Subject
政治學
Political Science
主題分類/Theme

DOI
10.53106/1018189X202403001
檔案下載/Download
Full Text Abstract
相關文章
  • Theoretical Review and Empirical Test on International Direct Investment: Ignored Factor of Home Country Characteristics in the Literature
  • China Discourse from the Late Twentieth Century: A Dialogue between International Relations and History
  • Guess Who Brings Home the Bacon: The Geographic Distributiion of Taiwan Provincial Grants
  • The Development of Distributive Policy Studies and Its Application
  • Media Discrepancies among New Immigrant Children: Corpus-based Frame Analysis

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3