Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Forthcoming Papers
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
Does Reducing Ability Tracking Improve Equity at the Cost of Student Achievement? Evidence from Taiwan’s High School Admission Reform

Number of Clicks:20; Number of Full Text Downloads:4;

發刊日期/Published Date
中英文篇名/Title
十二年國教免試入學的政策效果:教育公平改革是否以犧牲學生學習成就為代價?
Does Reducing Ability Tracking Improve Equity at the Cost of Student Achievement? Evidence from Taiwan’s High School Admission Reform
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
蔡咏諭
Yung-Yu Tsai
頁碼/Pagination
-
摘要/Abstract

本文探討十二年國教免試入學所帶來的公平與學生成就之間的取捨關係。本文採用二重差分法(DID),比較受政策影響的高中生與未受影響的國中生。結果顯示,改革使高中校內學業表現異質性增加 30 分(效果量 0.86),顯示以能力為基礎的校際分流顯著弱化。同時,低成就學生進入排名較高學校、接觸較優質教師及高成就同儕的機會明顯改善。然而,這些公平收益伴隨顯著學業代價:整體學業表現下降 50 分(0.18 個標準差),且負面影響均勻分布於整個成就分配。整體而言,研究顯示免試入學政策在擴大弱勢學生教育機會的同時,可能犧牲整體學業表現。

This paper examines the trade-off between educational equity and student achievement by analyzing Taiwan’s 2014 exam-free high school admission reform, which substantially reduced ability-based tracking. Using a difference-in-differences design comparing high school students exposed to the reform with unaffected middle school students, this paper finds that the reform increased within-school heterogeneity by 30 points (effect size=0.86), evidence of a major weakening of ability-based sorting across schools. Consistent with the policy’s equity objectives, low-performing students gained access to better schools, more qualified teachers, and higher-achieving peers. These equity gains, however, came at a clear cost: average performance declined by 50 points (0.18 standard deviations), with negative effects spread uniformly across the achievement distribution. A triple-difference design analysis yields consistent results. Overall, this study’s findings reveal a pronounced equity-achievement trade-off, showing that detracking can expand educational opportunity while reducing overall academic performance.

關鍵字/Keyword
能力分流, 教育公平, 學生學習成就, 十二年國民教育免試入學, 公平成就權衡
ability tracking, education equity, student achievement, exam-free admission, equity-achievement trade-off
學科分類/Subject
經濟學, 社會學
Economics, Sociology
主題分類/Theme

DOI
10.53106/1018189X202603001
檔案下載/Download
Full Text
相關文章
  • A Study of the Relationship between Entrance Channels, Family Background and Test Scores—Implications for Equality and Effiency of Entrance Channels
  • Educational Achievement and the Evaluation of the Nine-year Compulsory Education Policy: The Case of Taiwan
  • The Knowledge Effect of Civic Education: A Pilot Study Using Panel Data
  • Student Characteristics and Their Choices of College Entrance Channels
  • Do Public Exams Raise Student Performance? A Cross-National Difference-in-Differences Analysis

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2026. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.4