Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 21, Number 01
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2009 / March Volume 21 No.1
Do Public Exams Raise Student Performance? A Cross-National Difference-in-Differences Analysis

Number of Clicks:1687; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
2009 / March
中英文篇名/Title
校外公開考試是否提高學生學習表現?運用雙重差分模型的跨國分析
Do Public Exams Raise Student Performance? A Cross-National Difference-in-Differences Analysis
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
黃敏雄
Min-hsiung Huang
頁碼/Pagination
1-24
摘要/Abstract

實施校外公開考試制度是否會提高學生的學習表現?為了回答這個問題,筆者使用1995年與2003年的「國際數學與科學敎育成就趨勢調查(TIMSS) 」 資料庫,以同時有四、八年級學生參與的國家為分析樣本,運用雙重差分回歸模型來控制未觀測到的國家間差異,以有效評估校外公開考試對學生學習的影響程度。結果發現,有校外公開考試制度的國家,學生有較好的數學表現,但沒有較好的科學表現。雖然本研究發現校外公開考試對學生的數學表現有正面影響,但影響程度只有過去研究發現的一半。此外,當賽普勒斯與葡萄牙被歸類為有校外公開考試的國家時,校外公開考試對學生數學表現的正面影響就不再顯著。

Is a system of public exams conducive to student learning? To address this question, I employ a difference-in-differences methodology which isolates the effects of public exams from the effects of unmeasured country-level features, using data from the Trends in International Math­ ematics and Science Study (TIMSS) for students in Grade 4 and Grade 8 in 1995 and 2003. Findings of this study suggestthat students in countries with a system of public exams perform higher in math, but not in science. The positive effect of public exams on math performance found in this study, however, is only half as large as what was previously reported. Furthermore, when countries with public exams are extended to include Cyprus and Portugal, public exams no longer have a positive effect on student math performance.

關鍵字/Keyword
校外公開考試, 學生評量, 雙重差分, 學生學習表現, TIMSS
public exams, student assessment, difference-in-differences, student performance, TIMSS
學科分類/Subject
社會學
Sociology
主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • School Admission Reform, Academic Performance, and Equality in Educational Opportunity
  • The Relationship between Family Economic Status and College Entrance Channels: Evidence from Tunghai University
  • Student Characteristics and Their Choices of College Entrance Channels
  • Alternative Proof for the Consistency of the KPSS Tests Against Fractional Alternatives
  • Cram Culture

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2026. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3