Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 34, Number 03
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2022 / September Volume 34 No.3
The Ancient Social Spectre: Tao Xisheng and Wang Yanan’s Social Scientific Critique of Bureaucracy

Number of Clicks:5100; Number of Abstract Downloads:61; Number of Full Text Downloads:216;

發刊日期/Published Date
2022 / September
中英文篇名/Title
古老的社會幽靈:陶希聖與王亞南的社會科學官僚論
The Ancient Social Spectre: Tao Xisheng and Wang Yanan’s Social Scientific Critique of Bureaucracy
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
徐兆安
Shiuon Chu
頁碼/Pagination
425-464
摘要/Abstract

透過陶希聖與王亞南在 1920– 1940 年代對官僚主義的批判,本文探討國、共兩黨再革命理論所共有的思想淵源。陶希聖與王亞南批判官僚主義時所針對的,分別是 20 年代的國民革命以及 40 年代的共產革命。面對革命即將成功的希望,他們都以 20 年代興起的社會科學世界觀,運用「官僚」(bureaucracy)概念來涵攝各種深層的道德與社會問題,並明確指出革命不應只停留在政權更迭而已。本文既會把陶希聖與王亞南的著作,置諸 1920– 1940 年代的特殊脈絡裏,細緻地分析他們的具體境況;同時也將從官僚主義的思想史切入,探討再革命理論在 20 世紀初的獨特吸引力以及困境。

This paper historicizes Tao Xisheng and Wang Yanan’s critiques of bureaucratism and theories of further revolution. In contexts of the political culture from the 1920s to 1940s, the cases of Tao Xisheng and Wang Yanan reveal an unnoticed intellectual lineage shared by the Nationalist and Communist camps. Originally written in response to the Nationalist Revolution in 1920s and the Communist Revolution in 1940s, the anti-bureaucratic discourses of Tao and Wang shared a so-called social science discourse which emerged in the 1920s. Employing the concept of bureaucracy to encapsulate fundamental, and often moral, questions of society, they argued that revolutionaries should move further beyond the change of regimes. By contextualizing the works of Tao and Wang, this paper not only refines our understanding of the political culture of the 1920s and 1940s, but also sheds light on the appeal of the idea of further revolution, and its predicaments in the twentieth century.

關鍵字/Keyword
陶希聖, 王亞南, 社會科學, 官僚主義, 再革命, 國民革命, 共產革命
Tao Xisheng, Wang Yanan, social science, bureaucracy , further revolution, Nationalist Revolution, Communist Revolution
學科分類/Subject
政治學
Political Science
主題分類/Theme

DOI
10.53106/1018189X2022093403001
檔案下載/Download
Abstract Full Text
相關文章
  • War and Democracy: The Discourse of Democracy of Communist Party of China and Challenges from Zhanguo School in the Sino-Japanese War
  • Specters of Revolution: Two “Counter-Radical” Perspectives
  • The Political Form of the European Union and the Inter-State Social-Contract Aspect of the EU Treaties: Revisiting the Federation Theories of Pufendorf, Montesquieu and Rousseau
  • Taiwan's National Pension Planning: An Analysis from New Social Risks Perspective
  • Populism and Development of Democratic Politics: The Case of India

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3