Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 32, Number 03
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2020 / September Volume 32 No.3
War and Democracy: The Discourse of Democracy of Communist Party of China and Challenges from Zhanguo School in the Sino-Japanese War

Number of Clicks:2758; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of Full Text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
2020 / September
中英文篇名/Title
戰爭與民主:抗戰時期中共的民主論述及戰國策派的挑戰
War and Democracy: The Discourse of Democracy of Communist Party of China and Challenges from Zhanguo School in the Sino-Japanese War
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
施純純
Chun Chun Shih
頁碼/Pagination
411-449
摘要/Abstract

中共在抗戰期間以「民主」作為論述主軸,強調「民主」與「正義」之戰的必然聯繫,幫助中共在戰時的國共合作中爭取政治空間,同時論證中共統治的正當性與優越性。另一方面,中共亦透過其民主論述為蘇聯政治體制辯護,公開支持蘇聯,並在太平洋戰爭爆發後,強調中共與蘇聯、英、美的共同外交立場。戰國策派則從「大政治」的角度指出國際戰爭有其運作邏輯,否定了民主與戰爭性質的必然關係,並質疑中共在抗戰期間爭取政權的正當性。中共對於戰國策派的批判,因而呈現出抗戰時期複雜的政治局勢,以及中共在眾多限制下建立政權的難題。   

The discourse of democracy was the main propaganda of Communist Party of China (CPC) in the Sino-Japanese War. Chinese Communists emphasized the necessary connection between “democracy” and “just” wars, and justified their struggling for political space and state building. They also defended the political system of Soviet Union as democracy, and asserted common diplomatic ground of CPC, Soviet Union, United States, and Britain in 1942. The discourse of democracy was the strategy which CPC used to compete with Kuomintang under a united front. Zhanguo School noticed the serious national crisis, and insisted that international wars were irrelevant to morality and ideologies. They asserted the idea of “real politics” and repudiated the necessary connection between democracy and characteristics of wars. Zhanguo School challenged CPC’s discourse and political strategies, and tended to support Kuomintang government to increase the force of the regime. Therefore, Chinese Communists criticized Zhanguo School for their whole plan of war. This criticism reflected the complicated political situation in the Sino-Japanese War, and many difficulties of state building of CPC as well.

關鍵字/Keyword
中共, 民主, 戰國策派, 戰爭, 革命
Communist Party of China (CPC), democracy, Zhanguo School, war, revolution
學科分類/Subject
政治學
Political Science
主題分類/Theme

DOI
10.53106/1018189X2020093203003
檔案下載/Download
Abstract Full Text
相關文章
  • The Ancient Social Spectre: Tao Xisheng and Wang Yanan’s Social Scientific Critique of Bureaucracy
  • War, Nations, and Democracy: Changes in the Civic Discourses of British Idealists in the Face of Imperial Conflict
  • Organizational Involution and the Adaptability of a Leninist Political Party: The Case of the CCP
  • Specters of Revolution: Two “Counter-Radical” Perspectives
  • Rousseau, Kant and Perpetual Peace

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2026. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3