Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 02, Number 01
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
1989 / November Volume 2 No.1
Optimal Quota Policies in an Oligopolistic Market : The Welfare Effects of Trade Liberalization

Number of Clicks:1481; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
1989 / November
中英文篇名/Title
寡佔市場之最適進口配額政策:貿易自由化之福利效果
Optimal Quota Policies in an Oligopolistic Market : The Welfare Effects of Trade Liberalization
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
麥朝成, 黃鴻
Chao-cheng Mai, Hong Hwang
頁碼/Pagination
1-13
摘要/Abstract

在這篇論文中,我們利用一個非常簡單的寡佔模型分析長期與短期的最適進口配額水準。我們發現在短期不論是市場自由化(卽廠商家數增加)或者貿易自由化(卽進口配額提高)其對個別廠商產量之影響都不確定,端視需求曲線的曲度而定。只要市場需求曲線不是十分 convex,此二自由化措施均會導至個別廠商產量增加,市場價格下跌。在長期,貿易自由化則不會改變產品之總產量與價格。此外,一般而言,長期最適配額水準大於短期最適配額水準。

In this paper, we employ a simple oligopolistic model to examine optimal import quota levels in both the short and the long runs. It is found that the output effects of market liberalization (i.e., an increase in the number of firms or trade liberalization as measured by a rise in quota levels) are ambiguous in the short run as they depend on the convexity of the demand curve. The market price would fall and industry output rise if the demand curve is not sufficiently convex. In contrast, liberalization has no effect on market output and price in the long run. It is also concluded that the long run optimal quota, in general, is greater than the short run one.

關鍵字/Keyword

學科分類/Subject

主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • Export Subsidy Policy and Duopolistic Rivalry between Labor-Managed and Capitalist Economies
  • Comparison of Equilibrium Locations under One-stage and Two-stage Games in a Weberian Triangle Model with Duopolistic Market
  • Large Oligopolistic Competition and the Economic Effects of Relaxing Import Quotas: A General Equilibrium Analysis
  • Product Quality, Homogeneous Oligopoly and Social Welfare
  • Environmental Policies under the Total Emission Control Regulation

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3