Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 07, Number 01
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
1995 / March Volume 7 No.1
Welfare Rights and the Politics of Using Others

Number of Clicks:3155; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
1995 / March
中英文篇名/Title
福利權與使用他人的政治
Welfare Rights and the Politics of Using Others
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
許國賢
Kuo-hsien Hsu
頁碼/Pagination
223-245
摘要/Abstract

福利權在本質上涉及了使用他人,涉及了使用某一部分人的財產和勞動成果來掖助另一部分人,因此,除非證成了某些對於他人的使用的正當性,否則福利權將無法被合理化。本文旨在討論福利權該如何被合理化,就論述的展開路徑來說,本文先行分析諾吉克 (R.  Nozick) 所堅持的不得使用他人的規範,在理論上及實踐上所暴露的侷限。隨後本文又對於福利權所涉及的使用他人的類型進行釐清,並以「所有的人都能自由的平等權利」 爲基核,來證成福利權。最後則探討福利權如何能協助透顯「社羣」 的具體影像。

Welfare rights and using others are intrinsically connected. Yet, some theorists, among whom Robert Nozick is the most typical, stoutly deny the legitimacy of using others in political reasoning. This article contends that political life by its very nature cannot completely exclude use of others, and by further classifying different kinds of using others, tries to justify the legitimacy of a certain kind of using others, that is life­-sustaining use of others. The basic belief behind the justification is that misfortune as a human condition should not be casted away unreflec­tively for the sake of the inviolability of self-ownership. In discussing the foundation of welfare rights, the author also argues that welfare rights can be taken as a concrete way of visualizing the desirability of com­munity, which occupies a core place in contemporary debate in political philosophy.

關鍵字/Keyword

學科分類/Subject

主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • Sense of Fear and Politics
  • Humanitarian Missions after Political Democracy
  • The Political Cost of Democracy
  • China Discourse from the Late Twentieth Century: A Dialogue between International Relations and History
  • Introduction: Special Issue on Empirical Analysis of Public Policy

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3