Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 10, Number 02
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
1998 / June Volume 10 No.2
Economic Security and Pension Policy for the Elderly in Taiwan: A Preliminary Examination of Social Exclusion

Number of Clicks:4246; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
1998 / June
中英文篇名/Title
台灣地區老人經濟安全與年金政策:社會排除觀點初探
Economic Security and Pension Policy for the Elderly in Taiwan: A Preliminary Examination of Social Exclusion
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
古允文, 詹宜璋
Yeun-wen Ku, Yi-chang Chan
頁碼/Pagination
191-225
摘要/Abstract

本文強調在討論老年經濟保障相關措施與制度時,不能忽略了相關政策目標與原則以及其背後所隱涵之社會價值與意識型態。就年金制度而言,私人年金與職業年金一樣都有延續年輕時期的剝奪與不平等至老年時期的作用存在。在工作階段的不平等,影響了未來請領職業年金的資格,造成退休人口分處兩種國度的狀況:強勢的菁英團體領取高額的職業與私人年金,而弱勢團體僅能請領微薄的國民年金或是老年津貼。此種截然差異,與其說是年金制度設計不當,其實更反映出社會區隔丶階層化的深層意涵。除此之外,不同世代的人亦經歷不一樣的社會經濟狀況,而產生不一樣的晚年處境。所以階級、種族、性別與年齡結構皆會影響老年時的貧窮風險,形成社會排除現象。如果我國年金政策制訂與相關制度規劃時未能針對前述問題妥爲因應,是則不但可能無法減輕,反而還會加重這些社會排除的效果。

We argue that the social values and ideologies behind pension policy should not be neglected in the policy process. Private and occupational pensions are actually the extension of social exclusion in working life, from the stages of youth to retirement. This can in turn be linked to two divided groups of the elderly living in different situations: a dominant and elite group which has the high benefits of private and occupation al pensions, and at the other end, a disadvantaged group which claims poor-likely public pensions only. We suggest that, this is not only due to the inadequ acy of pension policy, but also is the result of social stratification. In addition, generations which experienced different socioeconomic situations can not expect similar retired lives. Social exclusion therefore exists across class, race, gender, and age. This is, therefore, an issue which needs further consideration for the development of pension policy in Taiwan.

關鍵字/Keyword
老人經濟安全, 年金, 社會排除, 台灣, 歐盟
elderly economic security, pension, social exclusion, Taiwan, the European Union
學科分類/Subject

主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • Active Ageing and Old-Age Security Systems: A Dialogue between Continental Europe and Taiwan
  • Adam Ferguson's Social Philosophy: Exposition and Assessment
  • Music, Institutions and Identity: How China’s People’s Music (1950–2019) Represented Taiwan’s Popular Music
  • An Investigation into Wang Jing - wei's Collaboration with Japan and its Relationship with the Guangdong Provincial Government
  • Cross-border Experiences among Taiwanese: An Analysis of the 2000–2010 Period

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2026. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3