2025年12月

重構信仰與知識的同源共生關係：Jürgen Habermas 的後形上學思維的系譜學觀點
Reconstructing the Homologous and Symbiotic Relationship between Faith and Knowledge: Jürgen Habermas’ Genealogical Perspective on Post-metaphysical Thinking

一般論文 Article

周明泉
Ming-Chuan Chou

73-128

於本文中，筆者主要探究Habermas（哈伯馬斯）如何以後形上學思維的系譜學方法，重構信仰與知識的同源共生關係。首先，筆者將處理為何Habermas 選擇信仰與知識這組關鍵概念作為鋪陳其宗教思想的主導性概念。其次，將闡釋為何我們在近代面臨後形上學思維的十字路口，必須在Hume 或Kant 之間做出選擇。再則，將剖析Habermas 為何將哲學史視為一種後形上學思維系譜學式的學習過程。最後，筆者將針對Habermas 在《也是一部哲學史》（AGP）一書中所展現出的傑出研究成果，進行批判性的反思，並提出四點值得商榷的問題，即：是否在AGP 一書中避談崩解歷史？我們在Hume 與Kant 之外沒有第三種選擇嗎？宗教語言轉譯成公共語言沒有不可共量性的問題？理性自由光靠激勵與賦權是否足夠？

In this paper, I mainly explore how Habermas reconstructed the homologous and symbiotic relationship between faith and knowledge through a genealogical method of post-metaphysical thinking. Firstly, I will deal with why Habermas chooses the key concepts of faith and knowledge as the dominant concepts to elaborate on his religious thought. Secondly, I will explain why we have to choose between Hume or Kant when we are facing the crossroads of post-morphological thinking in modern times. Furthermore, I will analyze why Habermas regards the history of philosophy as a learning process in the style of genealogical post-metaphysical thinking, and how he addresses faith and knowledge through this genealogical method. Finally, I will critically reflect on the outstanding research results presented by Habermas in the book “Auch eine Geschichte der Philosophie” (AGP) and raise four points worthy of discussion: Is there a tendency to avoid discussing the history of dissolution in AGP? We don’t have a third option outside of Hume and Kant? Are there issues regarding the incommensurability of translating religious language into public language? Is rational freedom sufficient solely through motivation and empowerment?

理性自由, 信仰與知識, 後形上學的, 後世俗的, 系譜學
rational freedom, faith and knowledge, postmetaphysical, postsecular, genealogy

全文下載