Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 14, Number 01
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2002 / March Volume 14 No.1
Articles on the Constitution of the Republic of China: Political Logic and Legal Analysis of the Items about Legislative System Reform for the Constitutional Amendment for the Fifth and Sixth Time

Number of Clicks:3537; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
2002 / March
中英文篇名/Title
第五、六次修憲國會制度改革相關議題之政治邏輯與法理分析
Articles on the Constitution of the Republic of China: Political Logic and Legal Analysis of the Items about Legislative System Reform for the Constitutional Amendment for the Fifth and Sixth Time
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
李炳南, 曾建元
Ping-nan Lee, Chien-yuan Tseng
頁碼/Pagination
111-173
摘要/Abstract

第五、六次修憲議題發展的主軸爲集中在國民大會制度的國會改革。一九九九年的第五次修憲係以無記名方式表決通過了依附立法院選出的政黨比例代表制新國大,但其中聲稱配合選舉時程調整的延長第三屆國大代表任期的方案,卻因輿論的反彈,而導致立法院聲請司法院大法官就該增修條文進行釋憲,終於在二OOO年第十任總統選舉後有〈司法院大法官議決釋字第四九九號解釋〉出爐,而以修憲程序違憲爲由宣告第五次修憲條文全部無效。在第四屆國代選舉行將展開之際,第三屆國大乃迅速進行第六次修憲,而通過以準公民複決爲其精神的任務型新國大,一舉解決困擾憲改經年的國大問題,並賦予立法院更爲完整的國會權能,使我國國會制度之改革終於走入正軌。

The major issue of the Fifth and Sixth Constitutional Reforms in Taiwan was the reform of the legislative system especially in respect of the National Assembly. The Fifth Constitutional Reform in 1999 estab­lished a system of proportional representation, based on the share of the popular vote each party received in legislative elections by secret voting, but at the same time it extended the term lengths of National Assembly delegates for the reason for regulating election schedules. Under pres­sure from public opinion, the Legislative Yuan asked the Grand Justices to invalid are these sections. Eventually, because of procedural errors in their passage,  all the sections of the Fifth Constitutional Amendments were declared invalid by the 499th Constitutional Interpretation, made after the presidential election in 2000 by the Council of Grand Justices. When the upcoming election of the National Assembly delegates was going to be held, the National Assembly delegates rapidly conducted the Sixth Constitutional Reform and established a new quasi-referendum system for a so-called "mission-based" National Assembly. This solved the hindrances to Constitutional Reform long posed by the National Assembly, and transferred more integrated legislative powers and functions to the Legislative Yuan. The reform of the legislative system thereafter moved onto the correct path.

關鍵字/Keyword
憲政改革, 憲法解釋, 國民大會, 比例代表制
Constitutional Reform, Constitutional Interpretation, National Assembly, Proportional Representation
學科分類/Subject
政治學, 法律學
Political Science, Law
主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • The Feasibility of the Role of the Judicial Yuan as Determined at the National Conference on Judicial Reform - Based on the Contingency in the Council of Grand Justices
  • A Study on the Constitutionality of the 1999 Constitutional Amendamets
  • The Myth of a Rigid Constitution in Taiwan: Its Origin, Persistence, and Impact upon Constitutional Reforms
  • The People and Constitution Making: The Experience and Significance of the Massachusetts Constitution Making (1776-1780)
  • The Political Form of the European Union and the Inter-State Social-Contract Aspect of the EU Treaties: Revisiting the Federation Theories of Pufendorf, Montesquieu and Rousseau

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2026. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3