Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 14, Number 02
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2002 / June Volume 14 No.2
The Optimal Industrial, Environmental, and Trade Policies for an Open Economy

Number of Clicks:1852; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
2002 / June
中英文篇名/Title
開放經濟體系下的最適貿易及環境政策
The Optimal Industrial, Environmental, and Trade Policies for an Open Economy
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
邱俊榮, 林佳蕙
Jiunn-rong Chiou, Jia-hui Lin
頁碼/Pagination
211-232
摘要/Abstract

本文以寡占市場結構下的國際貿易爲背景,討論政府的最適產業、貿易和環境政策。首先,本文以一個標準的 Brander and Spencer  (1985) 三國兩廠商雙占出口貿易模型的設定並考慮環境問題的情況下進行分析。在此設定下的出口補貼,由於污染稅的課徵會使本國廠商在決定最適污染防治量的同時達成出口補貼原來的效果,因此不需採取出口補貼政策,只要採行最適的污染稅-皮古稅即可同時達到移轉外國利潤與矯正污染外部性的目的。其次,本文討論一個兩國兩廠商的雙占進口貿易模型。此時最適的污染稅為皮古稅,最適的產業政策爲對本國廠商補貼至市場價格等於邊際社會成本,最適關稅則值得特別注意。在考慮了環境污染的模型設定下,課徵關稅所造成的效果比傳統設定下的關稅多了一個本國廠商增加污染防治的效果:對外國廠商課徵關稅可使本國廠商增加污染防治,使得本國政府無需課徵太高的關稅以達到移轉外國廠商利潤的目的,因此,最適關稅會小於傳統策略性貿易政策文獻中的最適關稅。

This paper studies the optimal industrial, trade, and environmental policies for an oligopolistic market structure. First, we extend the three-country, duopolistic, export competition model of Brander and Spencer (1985), incorporating environmental issues. The optimal pollu­tion tax can induce optimal pollution abatement as well as achieve the same effects as the optimal export subsidy. The Pigouvian pollution tax alone can shift rents from the foreign firm and correct externalities caused by pollution. Hence, the Pigouvian pollution tax can fully replace the export subsidy. Second,  we consider  a two-country, duo­polistic, import model. In this case the optimal pollution tax is a Pig­ouvian tax and the optimal subsidy rate makes the market price equal to the marginal cost. The tariff generates one more effect, pollution abate­ment, on domestic and foreign firms: Imposition of the tariff on the foreign firm makes the domestic firm increase pollution abatement, which in return reduces the optimal tariff rate to shift the foreign firm's rents. As a result, the optimal tariff rate when pollution exists is strictly less than that in the conventional strategic trade literature without pollution.

關鍵字/Keyword
污染稅, 污染防治, 出口補貼, 關稅
pollution tax, pollution abatement, export subsidy, tariff
學科分類/Subject
經濟學
Economics
主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • Environmental Policies under the Total Emission Control Regulation
  • Examing the Pollution Havens Hypothesis: An Evidence on Trade Liberalization and Environmental Regulations
  • Working Wives and Earnings Distributions: The Case of Taiwan
  • The Welfore Effect and Social Cost in the Presence of Misperception
  • Optimal Export Policy and Competition Strategies

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2026. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3