Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 15, Number 02
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2003 / June Volume 15 No.2
Liberal Education, Civil Edification and State's Governance: Michael Oakeshott on Education

Number of Clicks:3647; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
2003 / June
中英文篇名/Title
人文教育、公民教養與國家權力:論歐克秀之教育理念
Liberal Education, Civil Edification and State's Governance: Michael Oakeshott on Education
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
曾國祥
Roy Tseng
頁碼/Pagination
365-399
摘要/Abstract

本文之宗旨在於翔實地分析歐克秀的人文敎育理念。如同其藉由公民結社與企業組織這兩組概念來闡述現代國家之治理觀念的方式,歐克秀也傾向將西方敎育思想區分成人文敎育與社會敎育兩大範疇。對歐克秀而言,困擾著當前大學之最嚴重危機,乃肇因於一種訴諸理性主義以及與其相應的企業組織思維,來界說一個大學之社會目標的現代性企圖。爲了重振人文主義者之於人之所以爲人的本體條件的探究興趣,歐克秀因此呼應於他對理性主義與企業組織已所提出的著名攻擊,進而對社會敎育思想展開另一次嚴峻批判,但求伸張人文敎育思想的時代意義。如此,本文的論述主體將依循歐克秀的步調,從其帶有哲學懷疑論色彩的人文主義精神著手,重建人文敎育理念的主要特質。

The purpose of this essay is to give a detailed analysis of Michael Oakeshott's idea of liberal education. In line with his prominent account of modern state governance in terms of civil association and enterprise association, Oakeshott is likely to put Western educational thought into two main categories, namely, liberal education and social education. To Oakeshott, the most serious crisis that roils today's universities results from a modernized attempt to define the "social aims" of a university by appealing to Rationalism and the related notion of enterprise associa­tion. In order to revitalize a humanist's interests in studying the ontological conditions of a man being a human being, Oakeshott there­fore moves to launch a subsequent critique of social education in favor of liberal education, a critique which echoes his famous attack on Ration­alism and enterprise association in every respect. Accordingly, the major part of this essay will follow Oakeshott's steps to re-establish the charac­teristics of liberal education in terms of the humanist ethos evinced in his philosophical skepticism.

關鍵字/Keyword
歐克秀, 人文教育, 國家治理, 懷疑論, 理性主義
Michael Oakeshott, Liberal Education, State's Governance, Skepticism, Rationalism
學科分類/Subject
政治學
Political Science
主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • Political Participation in Developing Countries: On S. Huntington's Theory
  • On the Warranted Expectation of Norm Following Outlining an Architectural Integration of Moral, Legal and Political Responsibility from the Perspective of Application Discourse in Discourse Ethics
  • War, Nations, and Democracy: Changes in the Civic Discourses of British Idealists in the Face of Imperial Conflict
  • The Realist Moment in Marxist Theory of New Imperialism
  • Logical Positivism, Behavioralism, and Post-Behavioralism: A Theoretical Foundation of Empirial Political Study

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2026. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3