Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 36, Number 01
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2024 / March Volume 36 No.1
The Effect of the Gender Equity Education Act in 2004 on the Choice of Study Fields for Senior High School Students

Number of Clicks:3863; Number of Full Text Downloads:413; Number of Abstract Downloads:35;

發刊日期/Published Date
2024 / March
中英文篇名/Title
2004年《性別平等教育法》對高中生選組的影響
The Effect of the Gender Equity Education Act in 2004 on the Choice of Study Fields for Senior High School Students
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
高衡權, 劉家樺
Heng-chuan Kao, Chia-hua Liu
頁碼/Pagination
101-161
摘要/Abstract

《性別平等教育法》鼓勵女學生主修非傳統性別主流的學習領域。本文分析《性平法》對高中生選自然組的影響。使用資料為「台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫」及其後續調查。發現女性樣本中,《性平法》對選自然組、著重自然科學的學習、大學讀理工學門均有正面影響;但男性樣本中,《性平法》對這些變數均無影響。依公私立高中區分,公立高中分析顯示,《性平法》對女生選自然組有正面影響,對男生沒有影響;但在私立高中,《性平法》對男女選自然組均有正面影響。《性平法》對女生選自然組之影響可能與高學歷父親的性平觀念較佳,以及學習場域中,老師偏好女同學程度之上升有關。

The Gender Equity Education Act encourages females to study male-stereotyped courses in schools. Using the Taiwan Education Panel Survey (TEPS) and its follow-up, TEPS-B, this study examines the effect of the Act on the choice of  study fields in senior high schools. The results reveal that after the implementation of the Act, girls were more likely to choose a science program, spend more time studying natural science-related subjects, and select science-related majors in college. These effects were not observed in boys. Among public school students, the Act had a positive effect on the likelihood of girls choosing a science program but not on males. However, for private school students, this Act positively influenced the probability of both sexes choosing the science program. The likely reasons why the Act positively affects girls’ choice of science programs may include fathers with higher education levels valuing the concept of gender equality more or teachers’ preference for girls being higher after the Act’s implementation.

關鍵字/Keyword
性別平等教育法, 性平法, 選組, 主修領域, 台灣教育長期追蹤資料, 台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫後續調查
Gender Equity Education Act, GEEA, choice of major, fields of study, Taiwan Education Panel Survey (TEPS), Taiwan Education Panel Survey and Beyond (TEPS-B)
學科分類/Subject
經濟學, 社會學
Economics, Sociology
主題分類/Theme

DOI
10.53106/1018189X202209101
檔案下載/Download
Full Text Abstract
相關文章
  • Equality or Adequacy? A Comparative Perspective on Justice in Education
  • The Production Efficiency of the Highway Bus Service Industry After the Privatization of Kuo-Kuang Motor Transit Company
  • Gender Differences in Parental Choice of Education Investment in Children —The Case of Student Loans
  • The Influence of Family Language in Childhood on Educational Achievement
  • A Study of the Relationship between Entrance Channels, Family Background and Test Scores—Implications for Equality and Effiency of Entrance Channels

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2025. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3