Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Review Process
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》Volume 37, Number 03
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
2025 / September Volume 37 No.3
School Admission Reform, Academic Performance, and Equality in Educational Opportunity

Number of Clicks:1000; Number of Full Text Downloads:161; Number of Abstract Downloads:2;

發刊日期/Published Date
2025 / September
中英文篇名/Title
升學制度改革、學科表現及教育機會均等
School Admission Reform, Academic Performance, and Equality in Educational Opportunity
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
黃敏雄
Min-Hsiung Huang
頁碼/Pagination
535-564
摘要/Abstract

為了避免升學考試過度引導教學並促進學生的均衡學習,臺灣的高中招生入學歷經改革。改革是否降低學生的學科表現並削弱教育機會的均等,備受關注。在2014年之後,高中入學考試從常模參照改成標準參照,大幅減少計分的區別性。並且,至少在形式上,考試成績不再是錄取高中學校的唯一標準。本研究透過趨勢分析發現,在2014年以後,國中數學表現優異的學生,比例明顯下降,但數年後卻又明顯好轉。家庭社經地位對學生學科成績的影響並沒有隨著改革而增加。
 

Senior high school admissions in Taiwan have been reformed to avoid an excessive focus on academic competence and preparation for national high-stakes tests. In response, concerns have been raised over whether more holistic assessments of student performance for school admissions would dampen academic competence and erode equality in educational opportunities. In the present study, trend analysis and a longitudinal investigation revealed a significant decline in the proportion of high-achieving students in secondary school mathematics after 2014, when test performance ceased to be the sole criterion for high school admission, and when the high school admissions test changed from being norm referenced to criterion referenced. Although the policy reforms introduced in 2014 led to a decline in mathematics performance at first, a significant upturn followed soon thereafter. The effect of family socioeconomic status on student academic performance has not increased as school admission policies have changed over time.
 


 

關鍵字/Keyword
升學制度改革, 高風險考試, 學科表現, 教育機會均等, 臺灣
school admission reform, high-stakes testing, academic performance, equality in educational opportunity, Taiwan
學科分類/Subject
社會學
Sociology
主題分類/Theme

DOI
10.53106/1018189X202401001
檔案下載/Download
Full Text Abstract
相關文章
  • Do Public Exams Raise Student Performance? A Cross-National Difference-in-Differences Analysis
  • A Study of the Relationship between Entrance Channels, Family Background and Test Scores—Implications for Equality and Effiency of Entrance Channels
  • Student Characteristics and Their Choices of College Entrance Channels
  • Higher Education and Cramming for Examinations: The Roles of Educational Quotas and Low-tuition Policies on Social Mobility
  • Equality or Adequacy? A Comparative Perspective on Justice in Education

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2026. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3