Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
logo_m-Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy

    Jump To中央區塊/Main Content :::
  • About JSSP
    • About JSSP
    • Indexed in
    • Subscription Information
    • Contact Us
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
    • Guidelines for Submitted Manuscripts
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Statement Regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    • Online Submission
  • Volumes and Issues
    • Forthcoming Papers
  • Annual Statistics
    • Submission Trends by Academic Discipline in 2014-2024
    • First Round Processing Time of Submissions in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Viewed Papers in 2024
    • Top 10 Most Downloaded Papers in 2024
  • RCHSS
中文
RCHSS
search
Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy
  • Home
  • Volumes and Issues
  • 《Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy》 Volume 06, Number 02
  • Facebook
  • line
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Print
1994 / June Volume 6 No.2
Transferable Development Rights Market: Efficiency vs. Equity

Number of Clicks:937; Number of Abstract Downloads:0; Number of full PDF text Downloads:0;

發刊日期/Published Date
1994 / June
中英文篇名/Title
可轉讓土地發展權市場之效率與公平性
Transferable Development Rights Market: Efficiency vs. Equity
論文屬性/Type
研究論文 Research Article
作者/Author
楊重信、林瑞益
Chung-hsin Yang、Ruey-yih Lin
頁碼/Pagination
21-62
摘要/Abstract

本文以都市空間均衡模型分析可轉讓土地發展權 ( Transferable Development Right, TDR ) 市場之經濟效率與公平性。本文發現當外部性不存在時,TDR政策(限制一個社區或都市之土地總發展權,並按土地面積或素地價值比率分配給地主 ) 之效果爲:1. TDR政策使整體經濟效率下降,但使地主間利得 ( Development Gain ) 分配較公平;2.TDR政策與分區管制政策 ( Zoning Policy ) 之經濟效率水準相等,但TDR政策之公平性較高。其次,當外部性(如擁擠或居住密度外部性)存在時,1.在一個社區同時實施TDR政策與分區管制,其所能達成之經濟效率水準與單獨實施分區管制時之水準相同,但其公平性則提高; 2.在一個都市實施TDR政策可同時提高經濟效率與土地開發利得分配之公平性。

This paper incorporates a TDR policy into an open community and an open city, respectively. A TDR policy is defined as: set the total permissible development rights (DRs) in terms of floor areas, and then distribute the DRs among landowners in an equitable manner. It is shown that for either an open community or an open city in the absence of externality, the implementation of the TDR policy can achieve a more equitable distribution of development gains among landowners only at the expence of economic efficiency. Furthermore, for an open community or an open city with crowding externality, the implementation of the TDR policy improves both efficiency and equity.

關鍵字/Keyword

學科分類/Subject

主題分類/Theme

DOI
檔案下載/Download
Abstract full PDF text
相關文章
  • The Unified Public-Private Industry in Taiwan: The Institutionalist View
  • Economic-Environmental-Energy Interactions in Taiwan
  • Comment
  • Resourec Distribution in the Family and Society : A Synopsis
  • The Financial Condition of a Fully Funded National Pension Program in Taiwan

  • About JSSP
  • Editorial Board
  • Notes to Contributors
  • Volumes and Issues
  • Annual Statistics

Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, No. 128, Sec. 2, Academia Rd, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Tel: 886-2-27898156 Fax: 02-27898157 Email: issppub@sinica.edu.tw

© Copyright 2026. RCHSS Sinica All Rights Reserved.Privacy Policy & Security PolicyVersion:V1.1.3